1988
DOI: 10.1097/00004032-198808000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microdosimetric Basis for Exposure Limits

Abstract: Consideration of the energy deposited by ionizing radiation in microscopic volumes has led to new insights into dosimetric concepts at the levels of interest in radiation protection. Large amounts of energy are deposited by the passage of low linear-energy-transfer (LET)-charged particles through small volumes. If a typical cell nucleus is considered to be about 7 micron, at an exposure rate of 2.5 X 10(-1) C kg-1 h-1 (1 mR hr-1) from a 60Co irradiation, the average cell nucleus receives one energy deposition … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…alpha particles) because, in general, the dose response for tumour induction following exposure to these types of radiation is linear, with no variation in effect with dose rate (ICRP, 1991; UNSCEAR, 1993). The reason for this may be connected to the fact that, at the level of the cell nucleus, there is no such thing as a low dose rate; although only approximately 1.5% of cells have a neutron traversal of the cell nucleus following a tissue dose of 3 mGy (30 mSv), every cell nucleus that is traversed by a neutron receives a large dose of approximately 0.2 Gy (2 Sv) (Brackenbush and Braby, 1988). Therefore, the instantaneous dose rate at the level of the cell nucleus is unavoidably high (>5 mGy h –1 (Wakeford and Tawn, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…alpha particles) because, in general, the dose response for tumour induction following exposure to these types of radiation is linear, with no variation in effect with dose rate (ICRP, 1991; UNSCEAR, 1993). The reason for this may be connected to the fact that, at the level of the cell nucleus, there is no such thing as a low dose rate; although only approximately 1.5% of cells have a neutron traversal of the cell nucleus following a tissue dose of 3 mGy (30 mSv), every cell nucleus that is traversed by a neutron receives a large dose of approximately 0.2 Gy (2 Sv) (Brackenbush and Braby, 1988). Therefore, the instantaneous dose rate at the level of the cell nucleus is unavoidably high (>5 mGy h –1 (Wakeford and Tawn, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of how different patterns of spatial and temporal distributions of energy at the subcellular level affect the biological response of cells to very low doses of ionizing radiation has become a very active area of research. This is due to the increasing awareness that high linear-energy-transfer (LET) radiations (alpha particles, fission neutrons, ions) may be responsible for unique biological effects [13][14][15]. Plainly stated, the (unrestricted) LET is the amount of energy dissipated by a radiation per unit path length.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greater effectiveness of the high-LET tracks more than compensates for their smaller number per unit dose. This is illustrated by the microdosimetric concept of Specific Energy, z = ε / m, where ε is the energy imparted by radiation to matter of mass m [13]. It is a stochastic quantity and depends on the number of energy deposition events in the mass of interest, and therefore on the ionization density of the tracks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations