2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcystin-LR increases genotoxicity induced by aflatoxin B1 through oxidative stress and DNA base excision repair genes in human hepatic cell lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the conventional treatment technologies can eliminate intact toxic cyanobacterial cells effectively, these technologies have limited capability for removal of dissolved cyanobacterial toxins, which allows that these reach human populations via drinking water supplies in sufficiently high concentrations to cause adverse effects in the gastrointestinal system (Table 1). Chronic exposures to drinking water contaminated with cyanobacterial compounds, in some instances in combination with other confounding factors, have been associated with an increased incidence of liver cancers or chronic liver damage and diseases, as reviewed and discussed by Svirčev et al [12], and supported by recent findings [18][19][20]. Interestingly, epidemiologic studies have also linked chronic exposures to drinking water contaminated with cyanobacteria and their metabolites to the increased incidence of colorectal or small intestinal cancer in China [21], Portugal [22], and Serbia [12,23], or stomach cancer mortality in China [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…While the conventional treatment technologies can eliminate intact toxic cyanobacterial cells effectively, these technologies have limited capability for removal of dissolved cyanobacterial toxins, which allows that these reach human populations via drinking water supplies in sufficiently high concentrations to cause adverse effects in the gastrointestinal system (Table 1). Chronic exposures to drinking water contaminated with cyanobacterial compounds, in some instances in combination with other confounding factors, have been associated with an increased incidence of liver cancers or chronic liver damage and diseases, as reviewed and discussed by Svirčev et al [12], and supported by recent findings [18][19][20]. Interestingly, epidemiologic studies have also linked chronic exposures to drinking water contaminated with cyanobacteria and their metabolites to the increased incidence of colorectal or small intestinal cancer in China [21], Portugal [22], and Serbia [12,23], or stomach cancer mortality in China [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…While conventional treatment technologies can eliminate intact cyanobacterial cells with toxins quite effectively, these technologies have limited capability for removal of dissolved cyanobacterial toxins, which allows them to reach taps in sufficiently high concentrations to cause adverse effects in the gastrointestinal system (Table 1). Chronic exposures to drinking water contaminated with cyanobacterial compounds, in some instances in combination with other confounding factors, have been associated with an increased incidence of liver cancers or chronic liver damage and diseases, as reviewed and discussed by Svircev et al [12], and supported by recent findings [17][18][19]. Interestingly, epidemiologic studies have linked chronic exposures to drinking water contaminated with cyanobacteria and their metabolites also to the increased incidence of colorectal or small intestinal cancer in China, Portugal and Serbia, or stomach cancer mortality in China [12,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…DNA damage is enhanced when cells are exposed to both AFB1 and MC-LR, compared to the exposure to AFB1 or MC-LR, alone, because exposure to both AFB1 and MC-LR further increases the release of ROS. In this case, AFB1 induces genotoxicity through increasing oxidative stress and inhibiting the activity of DNA base excision repair genes [41]. Thus, induction of oxidative DNA damage is responsible for AFB1-induced hepatocarcinogenesis besides the elevated number of AFB1-DNA adducts.…”
Section: Afb1-induced Oxidative Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%