2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.11.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcontainers for protection of oral vaccines, in vitro and in vivo evaluation

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[65] Oral immunization with the microcontainer vaccine did not elicit humoral or cellular immune responses. [65] However, serum IgG was observed when cubosomes were delivered orally without encapsulation in microcontainers, which suggests that the microcontainers may hinder vaccine bioavailability. Thus, the impact of cubosome vaccine protection in gastric conditions is confounded by the reduced function observed when delivered in microcontainers.…”
Section: Liposomal and Polymeric Particle Delivery Systemsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[65] Oral immunization with the microcontainer vaccine did not elicit humoral or cellular immune responses. [65] However, serum IgG was observed when cubosomes were delivered orally without encapsulation in microcontainers, which suggests that the microcontainers may hinder vaccine bioavailability. Thus, the impact of cubosome vaccine protection in gastric conditions is confounded by the reduced function observed when delivered in microcontainers.…”
Section: Liposomal and Polymeric Particle Delivery Systemsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These cubic liquid‐crystalline nanoparticles can take on different geometries where physiochemically diverse drugs can be loaded in the separate phases, and the higher volume of lipids allows for larger drug encapsulation. Cubosomes formulated with dextran, OVA, and the adjuvant Quil‐A were loaded in templated cylindrical microcontainers made of the photoresist SU‐8 and coated with Eudragit L100‐55 for pH‐dependent cubosome release . Oral immunization with the microcontainer vaccine did not elicit humoral or cellular immune responses .…”
Section: Application Of Advanced Materials To Study Intestinal Immunologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, from 24 h and onward, the BMP signal increased consistently reaching a maximum at day 10 of the study, after which it was decreased at day 14. The ionized PS (38:4) (m/z 810.529), which is the most abundant phosphatidylserine species in the lungs (38), was expressed in the lung sections at all studied time points (Supplementary Figure S6). Analysis of the signal intensity ratio of BMP (22:6/22:6) as compared to PS (38:4) (m/z 810.529) showed that the intensity ratio of BMP/PS was increased from 24 h post-administration, reached a threshold at day 10 of the study, after which it was decreased at day 14 ( Figure 9B).…”
Section: Increased Bmp Lipids In Alveloar Macrophages Following Intramentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such polymer is commonly applied to protect APIs from the harsh gastric environment (enzymes and low pH). The fabrication of microcontainers and techniques for loading and coating, are well described in literature [17] , [20] , [24] .
Fig.
…”
Section: Validation and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%