2017
DOI: 10.3390/s17061375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcontact Imprinted Plasmonic Nanosensors: Powerful Tools in the Detection of Salmonella paratyphi

Abstract: Identification of pathogenic microorganisms by traditional methods is slow and cumbersome. Therefore, the focus today is on developing new and quicker analytical methods. In this study, a Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) sensor with a microcontact imprinted sensor chip was developed for detecting Salmonella paratyphi. For this purpose, the stamps of the target microorganism were prepared and then, microcontact S. paratyphi-imprinted SPR chips were prepared with the functional monomer N-methacryloyl-L-histidine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, both the surface chemistry and the pore sizes of the polymer can be affected by the extremely harsh conditions such as high temperature and strong acids necessary for at least partial removal of protein template entrapped in the polymer matrix, which can in turn impact adversely on selectivity and adsorption. To circumvent these challenges several other approaches have been developed to address these issues in bulk polymers, including; surface imprinting [31,32], epitope-mediated surface imprinting [33], and micro-contact imprinting [34].…”
Section: Imprinting Of Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, both the surface chemistry and the pore sizes of the polymer can be affected by the extremely harsh conditions such as high temperature and strong acids necessary for at least partial removal of protein template entrapped in the polymer matrix, which can in turn impact adversely on selectivity and adsorption. To circumvent these challenges several other approaches have been developed to address these issues in bulk polymers, including; surface imprinting [31,32], epitope-mediated surface imprinting [33], and micro-contact imprinting [34].…”
Section: Imprinting Of Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More papers were published on MIP sensors than any other types of sensors based on synthetic receptors (Web of Science, accessed 10 December 2019). Representative examples include MIP-based QCM sensors for human rhinovirus immunoglobulins [154], tobacco mosaic virus [155], and Salmonella paratyphi [34]. MIP films were deposited on the sensor surface via surface grafting [156,157] or electropolymerization [158,159].…”
Section: Nanomips In Assays and Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target analyte, avidin, was bound to the SIP with dissociation constants in the submicromolar range (125 nM), and the sensor demonstrated selectivity among functional homologues of avidin, i.e., neutravidin, extravidin and streptavidin [ 68 ]. A microcontact printing technique was proposed by the group of Denizli to produce MIP-SPR for procalcitonin with an LoD of 9.9 ng/mL [ 69 ] and for the detection of the bacterium monitoring Salmonella paratyphi in food supplies or contaminated water [ 70 ].…”
Section: Mip Coupled To Photonic Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present results offer a proof-of-concept of highthroughput single-bioparticle detections using a nanochannel-integrated micropore that would find wide applications such as in environmental monitoring of water 32 and bacterial screening of food. 33,34…”
Section: Particle Trapping Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%