1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf02443411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcomputer-based respiratory function monitoring system using impedance pneumography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual inspection of the chest wall movement or auscultation of the respiratory sounds is the traditional method of respiratory monitoring. However, various respiratory rate monitoring methodologies have been introduced, such as impedance pneumography (measures respiratory rate via electrodes on the chest wall) [ 9 ], piezoelectric plethysmography, or fiberoptic plethysmography [ 10 ]. However, in clinical practice, capnography, which measures partial pressure of CO 2 , is the generally accepted method for respiratory rate measurement during sedation [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual inspection of the chest wall movement or auscultation of the respiratory sounds is the traditional method of respiratory monitoring. However, various respiratory rate monitoring methodologies have been introduced, such as impedance pneumography (measures respiratory rate via electrodes on the chest wall) [ 9 ], piezoelectric plethysmography, or fiberoptic plethysmography [ 10 ]. However, in clinical practice, capnography, which measures partial pressure of CO 2 , is the generally accepted method for respiratory rate measurement during sedation [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respiration rate can be measured in a number of different ways, for example by capnography 4 . However, 5 , but this requires the use of electrodes and so is not the most comfortable method for the patient. Respiration rate can also be measured with a thermistor taped between the nose and the mouth 6 , but again this is not the best choice for comfort.…”
Section: Choice Of Technologies and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%