2012
DOI: 10.2980/19-1-3489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microclimatic response to increasing shrub cover and its effect on Sphagnum CO2 exchange in a bog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial trend of increasing ecosystem CO 2 uptake under the highest NPK load with increases in vascular plant biomass was reversed after 5 years when Sphagnum was out‐competed due to shading, litter burial, and possibly toxic effects (Bubier et al ., ). After 8 years, the treatment differences in mid‐season photosynthesis remained small and the vascular plant biomass shifted to more woody than foliar components, presumably due to competition for light (Juutinen et al ., ; Chong et al ., ). At Whim Bog, wet N deposition did not significantly disrupt the main shrub Calluna, but reduced the cover of Sphagnum (Sheppard et al ., ) and increased Sphagnum gross photosynthesis after 8 years compared with unfertilized controls (Kivimäki et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial trend of increasing ecosystem CO 2 uptake under the highest NPK load with increases in vascular plant biomass was reversed after 5 years when Sphagnum was out‐competed due to shading, litter burial, and possibly toxic effects (Bubier et al ., ). After 8 years, the treatment differences in mid‐season photosynthesis remained small and the vascular plant biomass shifted to more woody than foliar components, presumably due to competition for light (Juutinen et al ., ; Chong et al ., ). At Whim Bog, wet N deposition did not significantly disrupt the main shrub Calluna, but reduced the cover of Sphagnum (Sheppard et al ., ) and increased Sphagnum gross photosynthesis after 8 years compared with unfertilized controls (Kivimäki et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several studies assessed solar radiation transmittance below Arctic shrubs (Bewley et al, 2007;Chong et al, 2012;Juszak et al, 2014;Williams et al, 2014), this study compared shrub shading with shading by other vegetation types. Furthermore, the radiation and soil heat flux budget of Arctic tundra has been more extensively studied in Alaska, Canada, and Europe than in the vast Siberian lowlands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glasshouse experiments underestimated the (indirect) effect of adding N compared to field experiments when vascular plant shoots are present, indicating that the vascular plant effect found in field experiments at sparse cover is not so much a consequence of competitive interaction, but, rather, it is more likely to be mediated through other factors controlled for in glasshouse experiments. The presence of vascular plant shoots in the field could potentially aggravate the effect of N by increasing interception of snow (Dorrepaal et al, 2003) dry N deposition (Limpens et al, 2004) or, perhaps, enable more intensive competition with algae (Gilbert et al, 1998) by altering the microclimate (Chong et al, 2012). Why the direct effect of adding N in the absence of vascular plant shoots was overestimated in the glasshouse compared to the field remains speculative.…”
Section: Why Do Glasshouse Experiments Give Different Results?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2004) or, perhaps, enable more intensive competition with algae (Gilbert et al. , 1998) by altering the microclimate (Chong et al. , 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation