2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microchoerus hookeri nov. sp., a new late Eocene European microchoerine (Omomyidae, Primates): New insights on the evolution of the genus Microchoerus

Abstract: The study of Eocene primates is crucial for understanding the evolutionary steps undergone by the earliest members of our lineage and the relationships between extinct and extant taxa. Recently, the description of new material from Spain has improved knowledge of European Paleogene primates considerably, particularly regarding microchoerines. Here we describe the remains of Microchoerus from Sossís (late Eocene, Northern Spain), consisting of more than 120 specimens and representing the richest sample of Micro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although its incompleteness prevents taking measurements, direct comparison shows that this tooth is larger than those of Necrolemur anadoni from Sant Jaume de Frontanyà-1 (Minwer-Barakat et al, 2015b) and N. aff. anadoni from La Verrerie de Roches (Minwer-Barakat et al, 2017a), similar in size to Necrolemur antiquus from La Bouffie (Godinot, 2003) and smaller than Microchoerus hookeri from Sossís (Minwer-Barakat et al, 2017b). This specimen is therefore identified as Necrolemur sp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although its incompleteness prevents taking measurements, direct comparison shows that this tooth is larger than those of Necrolemur anadoni from Sant Jaume de Frontanyà-1 (Minwer-Barakat et al, 2015b) and N. aff. anadoni from La Verrerie de Roches (Minwer-Barakat et al, 2017a), similar in size to Necrolemur antiquus from La Bouffie (Godinot, 2003) and smaller than Microchoerus hookeri from Sossís (Minwer-Barakat et al, 2017b). This specimen is therefore identified as Necrolemur sp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Necrolemur shows size and morphological features that are intermediate between those of Nannopithex and Microchoerus: it mainly differs from Nannopithex in its larger size, more developed hypocone generally connected to the protocone, and double metaconule in the upper molars, wider trigonid and absence of a well developed paraconid in the M 2 and M 3 . Necrolemur can be distinguished from Microchoerus by its smaller size, less accentuated enamel wrinkling, absent or very small mesoconid and hypoconulid in the M 1 and M 2 , less developed metaconules and paraconule, and by the absence of the mesostyle that is present in the upper molars of almost all the species of Microchoerus (with the exception of Microchoerus hookeri, see Minwer-Barakat et al, 2017).…”
Section: Remarks On the Genus Necrolemurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Robiacian, Omomyiformes are represented by the genus Nannopithex and its putative descendant Necrolemur (Minwer- Barakat et al, 2015a), as well as the small-sized and rather diverse genus Pseudoloris. Microchoerus has also been reported from some Robiacian localities, although this genus has recently been suggested to be a paraphyletic group, and the taxonomic allocation of some Middle Eocene forms must be reconsidered (Minwer-Barakat et al, 2017). Regarding the adapiforms, during the Robiacian they are represented in Europe by the anchomomyins Anchomomys cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent works dealing with European Eocene primates have focused on the description of new material (Hooker, 2007; Hooker, 2012; Hooker & Harrison, 2008; Marigó, Minwer-Barakat & Moyà-Solà, 2011; Marigó, Minwer-Barakat & Moyà-Solà, 2013; Gebo, Smith & Dagosto, 2012; Gebo et al, 2015; Minwer-Barakat, Marigó & Moyà-Solà, 2012; Minwer-Barakat et al, 2013; Femenias-Gual et al, 2015), the revision of previous taxonomic assignations (Minwer-Barakat, Marigó & Moyà-Solà, 2013; Minwer-Barakat, Marigó & Moyà-Solà, 2016; Marigó et al, 2014) and the establishment of relationships between different taxa (Smith, Rose & Gingerich, 2006; Marigó, Minwer-Barakat & Moyà-Solà, 2010; Marigó, Minwer-Barakat & Moyà-Solà, 2013; Minwer-Barakat et al, 2017), with some exceptions focused on the diet (Ramdarshan, Merceron & Marivaux, 2012), the locomotor behaviour (Marigó et al, 2016) and the endocranial anatomy (Ramdarshan & Orliac, 2016) of several species. However, only a few contributions have been published regarding European primates from the early Eocene, recently including the revision of Agerinia roselli from Les Saleres and the description of the new species Agerinia smithorum from Casa Retjo-1 (Femenias-Gual et al, 2016a and Femenias-Gual et al, 2016b, respectively).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%