1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)09105-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microchimerism and rejection in clinical transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
67
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the number of amplifiable genomes was 500 to 3,000 cells as judged by amplifying a one-copy autosomal gene (data not shown), the microchimerism sensitivity detection limit was between 0.2% and 0.03%. In addition, analysis of female peripheral blood lymphocytes as well as of eight prepubertal females skin samples (nevi) and eight BCC from nongrafted females showed the absence of any Y signal, confirming the specificity of quantitative PCR which has been previously validated by others (19).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the number of amplifiable genomes was 500 to 3,000 cells as judged by amplifying a one-copy autosomal gene (data not shown), the microchimerism sensitivity detection limit was between 0.2% and 0.03%. In addition, analysis of female peripheral blood lymphocytes as well as of eight prepubertal females skin samples (nevi) and eight BCC from nongrafted females showed the absence of any Y signal, confirming the specificity of quantitative PCR which has been previously validated by others (19).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Of note, because the study was done on archival specimens, we could not test the presence of donor cells within the recipient's peripheral blood lymphocytes. However, such findings are frequently described in kidney transplants, reaching levels up to 70% of cases in the literature (19,20). In accordance, in some skin specimens, there were some donor cells expressing CD45.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that early mixed chimerism may not always persist over the long term, particularly with regimens that involve a combination of immunosuppressive techniques [34,35]. Hence, tolerance in mixed chimerism must be more carefully assessed in the setting of transplantation, owing to the possibility that chimerism may be dissociated with tolerance [36][37][38]. The results of DN-Treg-mediated NK cell suppression was intriguing, prompting us to further study whether adoptive transfer of DN-Treg could promote engraftment of allogeneic BM cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, tolerance in mixed chimerism must be more carefully assessed in the setting of transplantation, owing to the possibility that chimerism may be dissociated with tolerance [36][37][38]. The results of DN-Treg-mediated NK cell suppression was intriguing, prompting us to further study whether adoptive transfer of DN-Treg could promote engraftment of allogeneic BM cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two types of chimerism can be acquired through kidney transplantation: an induced chimerism in combined kidney and bone marrow transplantation to generate immune tolerance in the recipient 1 Many studies have tried to correlate the persistence of circulating donor cells with clinical outcome of recipients, 5-7 but very few have considered the presence of foreign DNA/cells either in the recipient blood or allograft prior to transplantation. 8 For the first time, in a recent study we provided evidence that women with end stage renal disease (ESRD) carry male microchimerism (Mc) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells before kidney transplantation. 9 When compared with healthy women, the presence of male Mc was more frequent (62% vs. 16%) and at higher levels [98 vs. 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%