2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.67.124006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcausality and quantum cylindrical gravitational waves

Abstract: We study several issues related to the different choices of time available for the classical and quantum treatment of linearly polarized cylindrical gravitational waves. We pay special attention to the time evolution of creation and annihilation operators and the definition of Fock spaces for the different choices of time involved. We also discuss the issue of microcausality and the use of field commutators to extract information about the causal properties of quantum spacetime.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The function γ(R) (apart from a factor of 8G) has a simple physical interpretation: it is the energy of the scalar field in a ball of radius R whereas γ ∞ denotes lim R→∞ γ(R) (the energy of the whole two-dimensional flat space). It is also possible to show [3,7] that γ ∞ /8G coincides with the Hamiltonian H 0 of the system obtained by a linearization of the metric (1). In order to have a unit asymptotic timelike Killing vector and a physical notion of energy (per unit length) we introduce the coordinates (t, R, θ, Z) defined by T = e −γ∞/2 t. In these coordinates the metric takes the form [2,14] …”
Section: The Field Commutatormentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The function γ(R) (apart from a factor of 8G) has a simple physical interpretation: it is the energy of the scalar field in a ball of radius R whereas γ ∞ denotes lim R→∞ γ(R) (the energy of the whole two-dimensional flat space). It is also possible to show [3,7] that γ ∞ /8G coincides with the Hamiltonian H 0 of the system obtained by a linearization of the metric (1). In order to have a unit asymptotic timelike Killing vector and a physical notion of energy (per unit length) we introduce the coordinates (t, R, θ, Z) defined by T = e −γ∞/2 t. In these coordinates the metric takes the form [2,14] …”
Section: The Field Commutatormentioning
confidence: 82%
“…On one hand it has an infinite number of local degrees of freedom and, hence, it is a genuine quantum field theory (in contradistinction to other symmetry reductions, such as Bianchi models, that have a finite number of global degrees of freedom). On the other, the system is tractable both classically and quantum mechanically, thus allowing to derive exact consequences independent of any approximation scheme [3,4,5,6,7,8]. The main reason behind this success and tractability is the fact that the gravitational degrees of freedom of the model are encoded in an free, massless, axially symmetric, scalar field that evolves in an auxiliary Minkowskian background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since this function is constant in and decreasing in , the conditions are satisfied. Our next example is a DSR analogue of the EinsteinRosen gravitational waves [52], which is of the DSR3 class (i.e., only the physical energy is bounded). It is shown in the appendix that in this case one gets for the MS proposal H ;…”
Section: B Bound On the Change Of Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[55]. For these waves, the physical energy turns out to be given by a nonlinear function of a different, auxiliary energy that is defined via quantum field theory in flat spacetime [52]. For each angular frequency and wave number ( , ) in this auxiliary theory, the nonlinear relation is …”
Section: Appendix: Dsr Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%