1985
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-007904-9.50014-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcarriers in Cell Culture: Structure and Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason is obvious that their porosity increases dramatically the surface area for cell attachment. The surface area of Cytopore is 2.8 m 2 g −1 , while that of Cytodex and Biosilon is only 6000 cm 2 g −1 and 225 cm 2 g −1 , respectively (Reuveny, 1985). 2) As the majority of cells grow inside the pores, they are protected against damage from shearing stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The reason is obvious that their porosity increases dramatically the surface area for cell attachment. The surface area of Cytopore is 2.8 m 2 g −1 , while that of Cytodex and Biosilon is only 6000 cm 2 g −1 and 225 cm 2 g −1 , respectively (Reuveny, 1985). 2) As the majority of cells grow inside the pores, they are protected against damage from shearing stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There have been extensive studies on immobilization of animal cells and its application in large-scale production of mammalian cells and associated products, such as hybridoma cells in the production of monoclonal antibodies (Reuveny, 1985;Heath and Belfort, 1987). The development of immobilized insect * To whom correspondence should be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%