2003
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.68.053615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcanonical temperature for a classical field: Application to Bose-Einstein condensation

Abstract: We show that the projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation ͑PGPE͒ can be mapped exactly onto Hamilton's equations of motion for classical position and momentum variables. Making use of this mapping, we adapt techniques developed in statistical mechanics to calculate the temperature and chemical potential of a classical Bose field in the microcanonical ensemble. We apply the method to simulations of the PGPE, which can be used to represent the highly occupied modes of Bose condensed gases at finite temperature. The m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
103
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(84 reference statements)
5
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the so-called classical field method introduces a methodology that effectively redeploys the GrossPitaevskii equation to account for the effects of quantum and thermal fluctuations [12]. It has previously been shown, for example, that populating randomised incoherent excitations that subsequently undergo conservative dynamics leads to the thermalisation of the system [68][69][70].…”
Section: Connection With Classical Field Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the so-called classical field method introduces a methodology that effectively redeploys the GrossPitaevskii equation to account for the effects of quantum and thermal fluctuations [12]. It has previously been shown, for example, that populating randomised incoherent excitations that subsequently undergo conservative dynamics leads to the thermalisation of the system [68][69][70].…”
Section: Connection With Classical Field Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30 However, it has brought a rather poor description of condensed Bose particles at finite temperatures. For example, we still do not have a complete agreement on the Bose-Einstein condensation temperature T c of the homogeneous weakly interacting Bose gas under constant density n, 31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43 not to mention its thermodynamic properties over 0 ≤ T ≤ T c ; see Refs. 42 and 43 for a review on the T c calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a cylindrically symmetric harmonic trap these are the total number of particles, the energy, and the component of the angular momentum along the symmetry axis. Once in equilibrium, we use the assumption of ergodicity to accurately determine the condensate fraction [26], and the temperature T and chemical potential b [22]. By varying the initial state energy we measure the dependence of condensate fraction on temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in agreement, the theoretical results lie near the upper range of the experimental error bars. Previously one of us used the classical field projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation (PGPE) formalism [19][20][21] to give an estimate of the shift in T c of the homogeneous Bose gas [22], which was found to be in agreement with the Monte Carlo calculations [5,6]. The PGPE is a dynamical nonperturbative method, with the only approximation being that the highly occupied modes (hN k i 1) of the quantum Bose field are well approximated by a classical field evolved according to the GPE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%