2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9517(03)00020-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcalorimetric, infrared spectroscopic and DFT studies of CO adsorption on Rh and Rh–Te catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He et al 79 The latter is supported by the experimental study by Jansen et al 66 The results obtained with the mechanism of Vincent et al, 18 coupled with the gas phase chemistry of Lindstedt and Skevis, 56 are shown in Figs. 2 and 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He et al 79 The latter is supported by the experimental study by Jansen et al 66 The results obtained with the mechanism of Vincent et al, 18 coupled with the gas phase chemistry of Lindstedt and Skevis, 56 are shown in Figs. 2 and 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The value depends on the coverage 78 and the geometry of the adsorbed species. 77 A higher initial value of 160 kJ/mol at very low coverages was proposed by He et al 79 The latter is supported by the experimental study by Jansen et al 66 that reports a heat of adsorption of 160 kJ/mol and barrier to desorption of 132 kJ/mol. An UBI−QEP calculation using Q 0̷ C = 350 kJ/mol produces a consistent value of Q CO = 166 kJ/ mol.…”
Section: Comments On Heats Of Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Given the importance of maintaining thermodynamic consistency, Jim outlined a general strategy to parametrize the kinetic model. , Pre-exponential factors in rate constants are usually calculated from collision theory or transition state theory. Activation energies are estimated from experimental data, but when reliable data are not available, they are estimated from theoretical calculations or by using empirical correlations based on chemical similarities between elemental surface reactions. , With the remarkable development of computational chemistry, Jim actively promoted the use of DFT to determine the structure, stability, and reactivity of adsorbed species and also Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to study nonuniformity effects on the catalyst surface. ,,, , ,, More recently, a multiscale approach models the essential surface chemistry combining DFT calculations and MC simulations to get further insight about kinetically significant steps. However, MKA was developed before these computational tools were available, and Jim suggested that the interest to learn deeper details of surface chemistry by using more sophisticated theoretical methods must be balanced by the practical need to solve complex challenges faced by society.…”
Section: Microkinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28][29][30][31] We have calculated the surface energies of the low index (111), (110), and (100) surfaces that are considered to be the basic structures of Rh particles; the surface energy of the Rh(hkl) surface in vacuum is dened as follows: 32,33…”
Section: Surface Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For metal Rh, the (111) surface is the most abundant surface 27 and has been widely employed to investigate the reaction mechanisms of C 2 oxygenate formation 15,16 as well as the adsorption of diverse atoms and molecules. [28][29][30][31] We have calculated the surface energies of the low index (111), (110), and (100) surfaces that are considered to be the basic structures of Rh particles; the surface energy of the Rh(hkl) surface in vacuum is dened as follows: 32,33…”
Section: Surface Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%