2005
DOI: 10.1080/02841850500270274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcalcifications of the breast: how does radiologic classification correlate with histology?

Abstract: The BI-RADS lexicon describes microcalcifications of the breast and provides diagnostic categories that lead to standardized biopsy recommendations. Nevertheless, how to link description to classification of microcalcifications is still a difficult diagnostic task. The evaluation of microcalcifications as proposed in this article may help to set standards in the clinical routine and in the comparability of scientific data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Defining imaging findings for modalities beyond mammography (i.e., breast molecular imaging for focal asymmetry) [18]; analyzing findings present in relevant subgroups of patients with breast cancer (i.e., findings that are more frequently observed in younger women with breast cancer or women with missed breast cancer), and the potential of relating these specific imaging findings with molecular phenotypes of breast cancer further emphasize the need to extract specific findings from textual reports [19][20][21][22][23]. Moreover, these imaging findings may enhance BI-RADS assessment for classifying risk within classes (e.g., BI-RADS 3 with microcalcifications) [24], and for predicting histopathologic characteristics that portend poor survival [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defining imaging findings for modalities beyond mammography (i.e., breast molecular imaging for focal asymmetry) [18]; analyzing findings present in relevant subgroups of patients with breast cancer (i.e., findings that are more frequently observed in younger women with breast cancer or women with missed breast cancer), and the potential of relating these specific imaging findings with molecular phenotypes of breast cancer further emphasize the need to extract specific findings from textual reports [19][20][21][22][23]. Moreover, these imaging findings may enhance BI-RADS assessment for classifying risk within classes (e.g., BI-RADS 3 with microcalcifications) [24], and for predicting histopathologic characteristics that portend poor survival [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Radiologically, typical malignant calcification is described as fine pleomorphic or fine linear/branching in the BI-RADS terminology. 35 Ductal calcifications associated with cancer usually range in size from 100 to 300 mm 16,36 and are more easily detectable histologically ( Figure 8). In most of the series studied, false-negative rates for core biopsies sampled for suspicious calcification are low.…”
Section: B3 Category (Lesion Of Uncertain Malignant Potential)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Morphology analysis is important for the diagnosis of microcalcifications, as a means of quantifying size and shape properties of individual microcalcifications within a cluster, according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon [1]. A number of authors have investigated a wide range of individual microcalcification morphology and intensity properties in the framework of computer-aided diagnosis schemes (CADx) [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%