2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-64235-6.50016-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbubbles coalescence during transport in vertical channel flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, given the low relative velocity observed, which implies low-energy collisions, the 0% efficiency returned by the energy model is not entirely surprising. Asiagbe et al [56] employed large eddy simulation (LES) to examine air bubble collision and coalescence in water flows at Reτ = 150 with db = 220 μm bubbles using a similar film drainage coalescence model. In evaluating coalescence efficiency, the authors observed that, in the near-wall region, the bubbles experience shorter contact times.…”
Section: Bubble Coalescence Efficiency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, given the low relative velocity observed, which implies low-energy collisions, the 0% efficiency returned by the energy model is not entirely surprising. Asiagbe et al [56] employed large eddy simulation (LES) to examine air bubble collision and coalescence in water flows at Reτ = 150 with db = 220 μm bubbles using a similar film drainage coalescence model. In evaluating coalescence efficiency, the authors observed that, in the near-wall region, the bubbles experience shorter contact times.…”
Section: Bubble Coalescence Efficiency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Asiagbe et al [36], in considering a Reτ = 150 horizontal channel flow with db = 110 μm bubbles, observed an effectively 100% coalescence efficiency throughout the flow, with this attributed to the low flow Reynolds number. The work of Asiagbe et al [36,56] used a high resolution LES with 2.1 M nodes although, clearly, not all the velocity scales were resolved, with the smallest scaled modelled after filtering. The unresolved scales, particularly near the wall, will have some effect on the bubble motion, and may be responsible for the differences found between the DNS-and LES-based simulations.…”
Section: Bubble Coalescence Efficiency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%