2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-019-0755-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiota analysis optimization for human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Abstract: BackgroundIt is now possible to comprehensively characterize the microbiota of the lungs using culture-independent, sequencing-based assays. Several sample types have been used to investigate the lung microbiota, each presenting specific challenges for preparation and analysis of microbial communities. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) enables the identification of microbiota specific to the lower lung but commonly has low bacterial density, increasing the risk of false-positive signal from contaminating DNA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Absolute quantification of the bacterial DNA present in our extracts suggested that the contrasting OTU profiles were likely due to differences in the recovery of bacterial DNA associated with each extraction method. In light of these results we agree with recent global recommendation that, when possible, bacterial DNA quantification should be performed to discern true biological variation from environmental noise ( Schneeberger et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Absolute quantification of the bacterial DNA present in our extracts suggested that the contrasting OTU profiles were likely due to differences in the recovery of bacterial DNA associated with each extraction method. In light of these results we agree with recent global recommendation that, when possible, bacterial DNA quantification should be performed to discern true biological variation from environmental noise ( Schneeberger et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Several methods have been described in the literature to isolate bacterial DNA from BALF ( Supplementary Table 1 ; Charlson et al, 2011 ; Erb-Downward et al, 2011 ; Pragman et al, 2012 ; Willner et al, 2012 ; Borewicz et al, 2013 ; Han et al, 2014 ; Renwick et al, 2014 ; May et al, 2015 ; Bernasconi et al, 2016 ; Dickson et al, 2016a , b ; Laguna et al, 2016 ; Marsh et al, 2016 ; Wen et al, 2016 ; Frayman et al, 2017 ; Zemanick et al, 2017 ; Ahmed et al, 2018 ; Kloepfer et al, 2018 ; Pattaroni et al, 2018 ; Esther et al, 2019 ; Gomes et al, 2019 ; Jorth et al, 2019 ; Kyo et al, 2019 ; Schneeberger et al, 2019 ; Tong et al, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2019 ). In some instances, successful recovery of DNA has been associated with the utilization of large volumes of starting material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite a low microbial diversity, absolute quantification of the bacteria present in the BAL fluid samples analyzed revealed a very high bacterial biomass during infection (up to 10 11 bacteria per ml of BAL fluid) due to the high abundance of the pathogen. Thus, although the possibility of contamination derived from bronchoscopy and the saline solution cannot be excluded in this study, such contamination, if present, would significantly affect the results only for BAL fluid samples with lower bacterial loads (less than 8Eϩ04 16S rRNA copies/ml), which was not the case in our study (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%