2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1809349115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiome interactions shape host fitness

Abstract: SignificanceAll animals have associated microbial communities called microbiomes that influence the physiology and fitness of their host. It is unclear to what extent individual microbial species versus interactions between them influence the host. Here, we mapped all possible interactions between individual species of bacteria against Drosophila melanogaster fruit fly fitness traits. Our approach revealed that the same bacterial interactions that shape microbiome abundances also shape host fitness traits. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
506
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 461 publications
(531 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(60 reference statements)
24
506
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The environmental characters responsible for the variation could include temperature or diet (Chandler et al, 2011;Moghadam et al, 2018;Staubach et al, 2013), and at least some genetic factors that shape the microbiota composition of D. melanogaster have been described (Broderick, Buchon, & Lemaitre, 2014;Dobson et al, 2015). An additional or alternative explanation is that the characteristics described for laboratory flies may not reflect the biology of wild flies, since the interactions of Drosophila and their microbiota can vary depending if the partners are from the wild or the laboratory (Blum, Fischer, Miles, & Handelsman, 2013;Gould et al, 2018;Inamine et al, 2018;Obadia et al, 2017;Pais, Valente, Sporniak, & Teixeira, 2018;Winans et al, 2017). Therefore, we cannot rule out that characteristics defining interactions between laboratory Drosophila and their microbiota, such as inconstancy, are different for laboratory and wild flies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental characters responsible for the variation could include temperature or diet (Chandler et al, 2011;Moghadam et al, 2018;Staubach et al, 2013), and at least some genetic factors that shape the microbiota composition of D. melanogaster have been described (Broderick, Buchon, & Lemaitre, 2014;Dobson et al, 2015). An additional or alternative explanation is that the characteristics described for laboratory flies may not reflect the biology of wild flies, since the interactions of Drosophila and their microbiota can vary depending if the partners are from the wild or the laboratory (Blum, Fischer, Miles, & Handelsman, 2013;Gould et al, 2018;Inamine et al, 2018;Obadia et al, 2017;Pais, Valente, Sporniak, & Teixeira, 2018;Winans et al, 2017). Therefore, we cannot rule out that characteristics defining interactions between laboratory Drosophila and their microbiota, such as inconstancy, are different for laboratory and wild flies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a suitable research strategy and model for studying the interaction of intestinal flora is required to facilitate a clarification of the characteristics of the intestinal flora ecology . A study of Drosophila melanogaster shows that interactions between bacterial species can affect host life and microbial abundance . It is possible that multi‐omic microbiome interactions may underlie UC disease activity.…”
Section: Ecological Imbalance Of Intestinal Flora In Ucmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macro‐organisms harbour complex microbial communities living inside and on their body (Margulis, ; Theis et al, ). These microbial communities, known as the microbiomes, can determine pivotal phenotypic traits of their hosts, driving a variety of ecological and evolutionary processes including major nutritive, reproductive and immune functions (Gould et al, ; Groussin et al, ; Hanning & Diaz‐Sanchez, ; Ley et al, ; Turner, James, & Poole, ). As hosts vary in the microbiomes they harbour, an associated functionally important phenotypic variation exists within host populations (Falony et al, ; Ferrari & Vavre, ; Jaenike, ; Oliver, Russell, Moran, & Hunter, ; Scarborough, Ferrari, & Godfray, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%