2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0188-4409(00)00080-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiological Findings in Febrile Neutropenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
1
10

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
38
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some authors reported an increase in Gramnegative bacteremia despite use of quinolone prophylaxis. 22 The use of quinolone prophylaxis in the present study reduced by 85% the risk of developing fever. The other variable associated with a reduction in the risk of developing fever during the neutropenia was non-myeloablative HSCT.…”
Section: S R Nt S R Nt S R Nt S R Nt S R Nt S R Ntmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…However, some authors reported an increase in Gramnegative bacteremia despite use of quinolone prophylaxis. 22 The use of quinolone prophylaxis in the present study reduced by 85% the risk of developing fever. The other variable associated with a reduction in the risk of developing fever during the neutropenia was non-myeloablative HSCT.…”
Section: S R Nt S R Nt S R Nt S R Nt S R Nt S R Ntmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…11,14,16,19,27,29,35,36,39 Haematological malignancies represented the main cause of neutropenia; seven studies included also patients with solid cancer (ranging from 5% to 44% of the patient population). Acute leukaemia was the most common haematological disease in 17 (57%) studies.…”
Section: 39mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kandemir ve arkadaşları, 81 febril nötropeni atağını değerlendirdikleri çalışmada enfeksiyonların %41'ini klinik olarak, %28'ini mikrobiyolojik olarak tanımlamışlar, %31'inde ateşin nedenini bulamadıklarını bildirmişlerdir [3] . Son yıllarda yapılan bazı çalışmalarda gram-negatif bakterilerin sıklığında yeniden bir artış gözlendiği de bildirilmektedir [18,19] .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Gram-negatiflerden en sık E. coli (%28), gram-pozitiflerden koagülaz negatif stafilokok (%14) izole edilmiştir. Gaytan-Martinez ve arkadaşları da %33 oranıyla en sık E. coli, ikinci sırada koagülaz-negatif stafilokok (%29) izole etmişlerdir [3,18] .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified