Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2007.00021.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial whole‐cell arrays

Abstract: SummaryThe coming of age of whole‐cell biosensors, combined with the continuing advances in array technologies, has prepared the ground for the next step in the evolution of both disciplines – the whole‐cell array. In the present review, we highlight the state‐of‐the‐art in the different disciplines essential for a functional bacterial array. These include the genetic engineering of the biological components, their immobilization in different polymers, technologies for live cell deposition and patterning on di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(156 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CMAs harboring microorganisms are often referred to as microbial microarrays. This review discusses toxicity assessment and focuses entirely on mammalian CMAs; the interested reader is referred to Belkin and coworkers' (50,51) comprehensive surveys about microbial microarrays. From a technical viewpoint, CMAs are categorized into two major classes (48), nonpositional and positional CMAs (Figure 2).…”
Section: Cell Microarray Formatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMAs harboring microorganisms are often referred to as microbial microarrays. This review discusses toxicity assessment and focuses entirely on mammalian CMAs; the interested reader is referred to Belkin and coworkers' (50,51) comprehensive surveys about microbial microarrays. From a technical viewpoint, CMAs are categorized into two major classes (48), nonpositional and positional CMAs (Figure 2).…”
Section: Cell Microarray Formatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initiated almost twenty years ago [1], the engineering of microbial cells with the purpose of chemical detection has enormously expanded since [2-4]. The major driving force for this development has been the advance in genetic engineering techniques; the relative ease to redesign (certain) hardware components in microbial cells and to assemble synthetic genetic circuitry for sensing and producing robust output signals.…”
Section: Microbe-based Sensors (Mbs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, MBS are self-propagating entities and therefore relatively easy and cheap to produce. The fact that different MBS can be engineered, which solely differ in target recognition but otherwise have the same reporter output signal, may pave the way for sensing arrays while maintaining relatively simple detectors and devices [4] (box 1). The main important advantage for using MBS, however, that (for the time being) only cells themselves can provide is the integration of biological processes relevant to the target one would like to address.…”
Section: Bioavailabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To turn such bacterial strains into on-line biosensors, they need to be integrated into a hardware platform containing all the components essential for continuous flow, combined with a sensing device (Elad et al, 2008). Elad et al (2011) described a flow-through biosensor with disposable modular poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) chips, incorporating agar-immobilized bioluminescent recombinant reporter bacteria, with a continuous water flow for up to 10 days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%