2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2005.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial transglutaminase and caseinate as cold set binders: Influence of meat species and chilling storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
42
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The persistence of residual MTG activity after 24 h was assumed to create additional crosslinking reactions and therefore increase binding of meat particles (Carballo, Ayo, & Jimenez Colmenero, 2006).…”
Section: Soy Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The persistence of residual MTG activity after 24 h was assumed to create additional crosslinking reactions and therefore increase binding of meat particles (Carballo, Ayo, & Jimenez Colmenero, 2006).…”
Section: Soy Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This MTGase/caseinate cold binding system appears to be more practical and useful than previously reported incubation binding systems because it could inhibit rapid growth of bacteria and keep fresh color of the restructured meat which can be distributed in the raw, chilled state. However, there are hardly any studies on how the time in chilled storage can affect the characteristics of raw and cooked restructured meat prepared with MTG as a cold-set binder (Carballo et al, 2006).…”
Section: Soy Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O' Kennedy et al (2000) reported that the combined addition of MTG and salt to a meat dispersion gave rise to a marked increase in cooking loss following heating. Similarly, Carballo et al (2006) found that weight loss during heating of restructured pork, lamb and chicken products was greater when both salt and MTG were used. These discrepancies in reported effect of MTG on water binding properties of cooked restructured products may be partially explained by differences in level and type of TG used and the different treatments (reaction temperature and time, meat particle size and disruption methods, presence of other ingredients, meat source etc.)…”
Section: Microbiological Analysesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, pH values of the restructured products did not change significantly by increasing MTG levels from 0.5 to 1% at either level of salt (1 or 2%) (P>0.05). However, the results of other studies showed that the use of MTG had no significant effect on pH of restructured meat or fish products (Pietrasik and Li-Chan, 2002;Jarmoluk and Pietrasik, 2003;Pietrasik and Jarmoluk, 2003;Beltran-Lugo et al, 2005;Dimitrakopoulou et al, 2005;Carballo et al, 2006).…”
Section: Physicochemical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation