1993
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(93)90032-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial tracers to evaluate an on-site shallow-placed low pressure distribution system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) was the experimental bacterial strain. An antibiotic‐resistant mutant of this strain was used by Ijzerman et al (1993) in a field study of bacterial transport from a septic leach line. E. coli is a well‐characterized, Gram‐negative, typical representative of the coliform bacteria, which are used as indicators of fecal contamination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) was the experimental bacterial strain. An antibiotic‐resistant mutant of this strain was used by Ijzerman et al (1993) in a field study of bacterial transport from a septic leach line. E. coli is a well‐characterized, Gram‐negative, typical representative of the coliform bacteria, which are used as indicators of fecal contamination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OWS installed in soils with higher percentages of fine-textured materials such as silt and clay, typically are more efficient at reducing microbial concentrations than OWS installed in sandy soils, due to the increased reactive surface area and residence time [7,14,15]. Research has also suggested that higher wastewater loading rates may lead to decreased treatment [8,[16][17][18] and that OWS that utilize low pressure pipe (LPP) distribution can more efficiently treat wastewater constituents such as bacteria relative to gravity flow effluent distribution systems [16,19,20]. LPP systems include a septic tank and pump tank, a pump that delivers effluent to the drainfield trenches via a pressure manifold connected to small diameter (2.54 to 5.08 cm) PVC conveyance pipes (laterals) that extend the length of each trench ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conveyance pipes are not capped at the end, and thus often deliver more wastewater to the front of the trenches than an LPP system. Because some of the earlier studies suggested that LPP systems could perform better than conventional OWS [16,19,20], there are less stringent siting requirements for LPP systems relative to conventional systems with distribution boxes in North Carolina. For example, in sandy areas, LPP systems can be installed in soils with 15 cm less soil depth and separation to groundwater than conventional OWS [21], and LPP systems typically require about 25%-30% less overall drainfield area than conventional trench systems with distribution boxes [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conclusively determine the effects (if any) of injection well and septic practices on the surface and subsurface waters of Key Largo, a well-designed tracer study was required. Tracer studies have been effectively used to investigate the migration of wastewater and efficiency of sewage treatment (5). Using this approach, we have studied the migration of simulated wastes in the subsurface by seeding a septic tank and a simulated injection well with different bacteriophages and following their fate as a function of time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%