2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12560-019-09384-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial Source Tracking Analysis Using Viral Indicators in Santa Lucía and Uruguay Rivers, Uruguay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another surveillance study performed in Negro River, in the Brazilian Amazonic region, HAdV mean viral concentrations were similar to our study (10 6 GC/L) and RVA mean viral concentrations were lower (10 4 -10 5 GC/L) (Girones et al, 2010). Bortagaray et al (2019) found mean viral concentration of 10 4 GC/L of both HAdV and BoPyV in water samples from a river in Uruguay. In a study using water samples from a river in Sweden, HAdV and BoPyV mean viral concentrations were of 5.2 × 10 4 GC/L and 1.0 × 10 2 GC/L, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another surveillance study performed in Negro River, in the Brazilian Amazonic region, HAdV mean viral concentrations were similar to our study (10 6 GC/L) and RVA mean viral concentrations were lower (10 4 -10 5 GC/L) (Girones et al, 2010). Bortagaray et al (2019) found mean viral concentration of 10 4 GC/L of both HAdV and BoPyV in water samples from a river in Uruguay. In a study using water samples from a river in Sweden, HAdV and BoPyV mean viral concentrations were of 5.2 × 10 4 GC/L and 1.0 × 10 2 GC/L, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In Uruguay, a study also showed HAdV as the most prevalent virus, followed by BoPyV in waters from a basin and a river, with viral concentrations varying from 10 2 to 10 4 GC/L. The authors also showed that HAdV particles from analyzed samples were infective (Bortagaray et al, 2019). In our study, RVA was detected less frequently than HAdV but presented higher viral concentrations (up to 10 9 GC/L).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Here, the review of global studies suggests that AdVs, AiV, FRNAP-II, FRNAP-III, crAssphage and PMMoV are detected more frequently and at high concentrations in wastewater and within polluted water bodies than the other indicators reviewed. PyVs are also present in wastewater at high concentrations, however, they are less prevalent in the environment than AdV (Albinana-Gimenez et al, 2009;Bortagaray et al, 2019;Dias et al, 2018a, b;Haramoto et al, 2010;Moresco et al, 2012), suggesting rapid degradation. Similarly, while FRNAP-II and FRNAP-III are initially found at high concentrations in wastewater, it is likely that they degrade more rapidly in the environment than AdV.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular tools haves been increasingly used in environmental microbiology, bacterial ecology and in environmental monitoring of pathogens and toxins (Martínez de la Escalera et al, 2017; Bortagaray et al, 2019;Kumar et al, 2021). However, in the assessment of fecal contamination of beaches, these tools have only been used for the assessment of water samples in Uruguay (Bortagaray et al, 2019(Bortagaray et al, , 2020, where monitoring efforts of fecal contamination in sand samples have been scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular tools haves been increasingly used in environmental microbiology, bacterial ecology and in environmental monitoring of pathogens and toxins (Martínez de la Escalera et al, 2017; Bortagaray et al, 2019;Kumar et al, 2021). However, in the assessment of fecal contamination of beaches, these tools have only been used for the assessment of water samples in Uruguay (Bortagaray et al, 2019(Bortagaray et al, , 2020, where monitoring efforts of fecal contamination in sand samples have been scarce. Although some research works have incorporated the analysis of soil samples, including sediment, sand or intertidal beach bio lms for monitoring the environment using molecular techniques (Martínez de la Escalera, 2014; Piccini & García-Alonso, 2015), few studies have been focused on molecular monitoring of fecal contamination (Soumastre et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%