Microbial Signatures of Deep Subsurface Shale Biosphere

Akondi, Rawlings N.; Sharma, Shikha

doi:10.1130/abs/2019am-335831

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The agreement is reasonably good with the dσ/dΩ CLAS data and Akondi results over most of the angular range below about 1800 MeV while there are a few places above that energy where the prediction has a bump at forward angles not seen in the data. The quality of agreement of our prediction with the CLAS [45] and Akondi [46] measurements suggests that the couplings to γn and KΛ are highly constrained by the other reactions. It also lends credence to the fits presented in this work.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 72%

“…energies near 1900 MeV. Our predictions are compared to differ-ential cross-section data by CLAS [45] and Akondi [46] in Fig. 6.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…DE-FG02-01ER41194 and de-sc0014323, and by the Department of Physics at Kent State University. [45] and AKONDI 2018 [46]. The green curve shows our prediction and the data points are from COMPTON 2017 [45] and AKONDI 2018 [46].…”

Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Partial-wave analysis of γp→K+Λ using a multichannel framework

Hunt

Manley

2019

Phys. Rev. C

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Results from a partial-wave analysis of the reaction γp → K + Λ are presented. The reaction is dominated by the S11(1650) and P13(1720) resonances at low energies and by P13(1900) at higher energies. There are small contributions from all amplitudes up to and including G17, with F17 necessary for obtaining a good fit of several of the spin observables. We find evidence for P11(1880), D13(2120), and D15(2080) resonances, as well as a possible F17 resonance near 2300 MeV, which is expected from quark-model predictions. Some predictions for γn → K 0 Λ are also included. arXiv:1804.07422v3 [nucl-ex]

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 72%

“…energies near 1900 MeV. Our predictions are compared to differ-ential cross-section data by CLAS [45] and Akondi [46] in Fig. 6.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 94%