2015
DOI: 10.1128/aem.03930-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial Safety and Sanitary Quality of Strawberry Primary Production in Belgium: Risk Factors for Salmonella and Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Contamination

Abstract: Strawberries are an important fruit in Belgium in both production and consumption, but little information is available about the presence of Salmonella and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in these berries, the risk factors in agricultural production, and possible specific mitigation options. In 2012, a survey was undertaken of three soil and three soilless cultivation systems in Belgium. No Salmonella spp. were isolated. No STEC was detected in the strawberry samples (0 of 72), but STEC was detec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delbeke et al . [10] enumerated E. coli in two of 72 samples in a study similar to ours, whereas in Yoon et al . [9] and Muherjee et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Delbeke et al . [10] enumerated E. coli in two of 72 samples in a study similar to ours, whereas in Yoon et al . [9] and Muherjee et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Delbeke et al . [10] detected E. coli in approximately 30% of the substrate samples and 56% of the water samples. The higher prevalence of E.coli in water samples in our study can be explained by the fact that the Norwegian producers used surface water without treatment, while in Belgium borehole water and collected rainfall water stored in ponds with or without barriers were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ultimately, there are no comprehensive prospective studies directly linking microbial contamination of fresh produce to that of hands, soil, water, or surfaces in the natural setting of the agricultural production environment. This may be due to logistical constraints in setting up a matched study design (6,17), resource constraints in acquiring large sample sizes (18), application of the appropriate statistical analyses to account for multivariable factors affecting microbial contamination (6,(19)(20)(21), and data variability from diverse microbial distributions on produce and environmental samples (22)(23)(24). Because of the low rate of detection of pathogen contamination (25)(26)(27)(28), populations of microbial-indicator organisms, including organisms that indicate filth (coliforms) and/or fecal contamination (Escherichia coli, Enterococcus spp., and somatic coliphage), can be monitored (reviewed in references 29 to 31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%