“…To achieve a feasible accuracy in interpreting the postmortem ethanol analysis results and in defining the origin (whether it is a result of antemortem consumption or postmortem microbial production or both) of the measured ethanol, various factors have been evaluated [ 5 , 10 , 11 ], such as the putrefaction state of the cadaver at autopsy, the clinical history of the deceased, the determination of non-oxidative metabolites of ethanol, the identification of microbes in the analyzed sample, and the evaluation of the discrepancies between ethanol concentration from various sampling sites and from different specimens [ 5 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Furthermore, the detection of low-molecular-weight volatiles in postmortem specimens was related to the microbial ethanol neo-formation [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Specifically, the volatile compounds known as higher, or congener, alcohols—referring mainly to 1-propanol (or n-propanol), isobutanol (or methyl-1-propanol), 2- methyl-1-butanol (or isoamyl-alcohol), 3-methyl-2-butanol (or amyl-alcohol), and 1-butanol (or n-butanol)—are often detected in postmortem specimens [ 24 , 25 , 26 ], and their presence is considered indicative of putrefaction and microbial activity [ 18 , 27 ].…”