Plant Responses to Xenobiotics 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-2860-1_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial-Mediated Management of Organic Xenobiotic Pollutants in Agricultural Lands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of microorganisms in removing xenobiotics from soil, water or sediments through complete transformation or mineralization into harmless end products like CO 2 and H 2 O is a basic concept of bioremediation strategy (Ortiz et al, 2013 ; Singh et al, 2016 ). Different microorganisms including bacteria ( Pseudomonas, Alcaligenes, Cellulosimicrobium, Microbacterium, Micrococcus, Methanospirillum, Aeromonas, Bacillus, Sphingobium, Flavobacterium , and Rhodococcus ), fungi ( Aspergillus, Penecillium, Trichoderma , and Fusarium ), and yeasts ( Pichia, Rhodotorula, Candida, Aureobasidium , and Exophiala ) have been reported to be involved in the efficient biodegradation of xenobiotic compounds from contaminated soil/water environments, due to their exceptional bioremediation potential (Sathishkumar et al, 2008 ; Nzila, 2013 ; Sunita et al, 2013 ; Zhao Q. et al, 2017 ; Bharadwaj, 2018 ; Yang J. et al, 2018 ; Yang T. et al, 2018 ; Yu Y. et al, 2019 ; Bhatt et al, 2020c ).…”
Section: Bioremediation Potential Of Microorganisms For Xenobiotic Comentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The application of microorganisms in removing xenobiotics from soil, water or sediments through complete transformation or mineralization into harmless end products like CO 2 and H 2 O is a basic concept of bioremediation strategy (Ortiz et al, 2013 ; Singh et al, 2016 ). Different microorganisms including bacteria ( Pseudomonas, Alcaligenes, Cellulosimicrobium, Microbacterium, Micrococcus, Methanospirillum, Aeromonas, Bacillus, Sphingobium, Flavobacterium , and Rhodococcus ), fungi ( Aspergillus, Penecillium, Trichoderma , and Fusarium ), and yeasts ( Pichia, Rhodotorula, Candida, Aureobasidium , and Exophiala ) have been reported to be involved in the efficient biodegradation of xenobiotic compounds from contaminated soil/water environments, due to their exceptional bioremediation potential (Sathishkumar et al, 2008 ; Nzila, 2013 ; Sunita et al, 2013 ; Zhao Q. et al, 2017 ; Bharadwaj, 2018 ; Yang J. et al, 2018 ; Yang T. et al, 2018 ; Yu Y. et al, 2019 ; Bhatt et al, 2020c ).…”
Section: Bioremediation Potential Of Microorganisms For Xenobiotic Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metatranscriptomic analysis of the wheat rhizosphere identified dominant bacterial communities of diverse taxonomic phyla, including Acidobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Steptophyta, Ascomycota, and Firmicutes, having functional roles in the degradation of various xenobiotic pollutants (Singh D. P. et al, 2018 ). Multiple enzymes such as isomerases, oxygenases, decarboxylases, reductases, kinases, and inner membrane translocators were identified that were associated with 21 different pathways for benzoates, aromatic amines, phenols, bisphenols, and other xenobiotics (Singh et al, 2016 ). An et al ( 2020 ) elucidated the study of the transcriptome for the characterization of hexaconazole degrading strain Sphingobacterium multivorum , obtained from activated sludge.…”
Section: Recent Advanced Technologies Employed In Bioremediation For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioremediation methods are mostly designed by using micro-organisms. Removing xenobiotics form sediments, soil, or water represents the process of obtaining CO 2 and H 2 O, products that do not cause damage to the environment [103,104]. The findings obtained in the research, presented in Table 2, reveal that different types of micro-organisms can degrade xenobiotic compounds.…”
Section: Basics Of Xenobiotic Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SG2 (Pankaj et al, 2016), B. subtilis BSF01 , B. subtilis strain 1D (Gangola et al, 2018), Bacillus sp. AKD1 (Tiwary and Dubey, 2016), Bacillus sp. ISTDS2 (Sundaram et al, 2013) and B. licheniformis B-1 (Lai et al, 2012).…”
Section: Bacilli-mediated Degradation Of Pyrethroid Insecticidesmentioning
confidence: 99%