2003
DOI: 10.1080/j.1600-0412.2003.00047.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial invasion and cytokine response in amniotic fluid in a Swedish population of women in preterm labor

Abstract: Background. Previous studies indicate an association between intra-amniotic microbial invasion and/or inflammation and spontaneous preterm birth, but there is a limited amount of data available from Europe. The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of intra-amniotic microorganisms and cytokines (interleukin-6 and interleukin-8) in a Swedish population of women in preterm labor and their correlation with preterm birth. Methods. Amniotic fluid was retrieved transabdominally from 61 patients in pret… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
28
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our current study we found that nearly 53% of the women with pPROM leading to PTB (< 34 weeks of gestation) had an elevated IL‐6 level (≥ 0.80 ng/ml) compared to 31% of those that delivered ≥ 34 weeks. Our data agree with the fact that intra‐amniotic IL‐6 is one of the best predictors of preterm delivery (13) even if the sensitivity and specificity are not as high as in PTL patients (11). It has previously been shown that IL‐6 is not as good a predictor of microbial invasion of the AF in pPROM as in PTL patients, and microbial invasion of the AF is related to a short amniocentesis–delivery interval (19).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our current study we found that nearly 53% of the women with pPROM leading to PTB (< 34 weeks of gestation) had an elevated IL‐6 level (≥ 0.80 ng/ml) compared to 31% of those that delivered ≥ 34 weeks. Our data agree with the fact that intra‐amniotic IL‐6 is one of the best predictors of preterm delivery (13) even if the sensitivity and specificity are not as high as in PTL patients (11). It has previously been shown that IL‐6 is not as good a predictor of microbial invasion of the AF in pPROM as in PTL patients, and microbial invasion of the AF is related to a short amniocentesis–delivery interval (19).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It has previously been shown that IL‐6 is not as good a predictor of microbial invasion of the AF in pPROM as in PTL patients, and microbial invasion of the AF is related to a short amniocentesis–delivery interval (19). We also found that the alpha chemokine IL‐8, which induces neutrophil attractant and activating responses, was highly expressed in the AF with pPROM but did not have as high a sensitivity and specificity as in the PTL group (11). This difference in prediction of PTB between the PTL and pPROM groups is not surprising, as different mechanisms appear to be important in pPROM compared to PTL (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Table describes demographic data and pregnancy outcomes among the three groups. As expected , the amniotic fluid IL‐6 level was higher, glucose was lower and gestational age at delivery was earlier in women with MIAC regardless of the microorganism isolated. However, gestational age at admission was earlier, and maternal CRP and WBC levels, rate of preterm delivery at <24.0 weeks and the occurrence of clinical chorioamnionitis were significantly higher in the group with MIAC than other microorganisms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) is a subclinical stage of infection involved in the etiopathology of PTL mainly at earlier gestational ages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Preterm labour in correlation with infection is extensively studied. A significant cytokine increase is seen in gestational membranes, amniotic and cervicovaginal fluid in infected preterm labour [3,21,38-40]. In our study, none of the women showed clinical or laboratory signs of infection before or after labour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%