2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19018-1_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial Interaction in Mining Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig.2, the intrinsic viscosity decreased with increasing concentration of nanoparticles [13,14]. However, the intrinsic viscosity which is calculated by Eq.…”
Section: Fig1: Relative Viscosity Vs Different Concentration Of Ag mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As shown in Fig.2, the intrinsic viscosity decreased with increasing concentration of nanoparticles [13,14]. However, the intrinsic viscosity which is calculated by Eq.…”
Section: Fig1: Relative Viscosity Vs Different Concentration Of Ag mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, the above workers also reported Streptomyces as the most common siderophore producers which were recovered from different niches such as rhizosphere, vermicompost soil and plant tissues as endophytes. Usually, iron-deficient conditions trigger siderophore production in microorganisms [41] but the study site is a limestone mining site which is expected to be contaminated with various heavy metals including iron due to mining activities [42]. But, maybe due to low iron bioavailability [43], the isolates were triggered for siderophore production.…”
Section: Siderophore Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%