2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial H2S generation in hydrocarbon reservoirs: Analysis of mechanisms and recent remediation technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other methods to inhibit microbial impact include nitrate injection [215] and perchlorate treatment [216,217]. A detailed review of these methods is presented in the recent literature [218]. Porous reservoirs may experience permanent deformation that results in volume loss.…”
Section: Mitigation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods to inhibit microbial impact include nitrate injection [215] and perchlorate treatment [216,217]. A detailed review of these methods is presented in the recent literature [218]. Porous reservoirs may experience permanent deformation that results in volume loss.…”
Section: Mitigation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 H 2 S and CO 2 are commonly cogenerated via thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) reactions in the deep carbonate reservoirs, which involves complex redox reactions of sulfate minerals with petroleum. 15,16 The coexistence CO 2 and H 2 S also occurs during oil and gas production operations due to the sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRP) after secondary recovery by (sea) water flooding (see example in ref 17) and thermal recovery/steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) via aquathermolysis (hydrolysis) (see example in ref 18), which could cause serious reservoir souring and associated production issues such as internal corrosion in oil and gas pipelines, and pipeline failure, perforations, leaks, and cracks (see examples in refs 19−21). It not only causes huge economic losses but also poses a serious safety and environmental concern because H 2 S is highly toxic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, co-injecting CO 2 and hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) is proposed as a suitable carbon capture and storage (CCS) scheme due to the high costs of purifying, capturing, and compressing CO 2 . , In addition, there are numerous sour gas reservoirs (with the H 2 S concentration of more than four ppm) around the world, such as the Upper Smackover Formation, Mississippi, USA, and Lower Triassic Feixiangguan Formation, Sichuan, China . H 2 S and CO 2 are commonly cogenerated via thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) reactions in the deep carbonate reservoirs, which involves complex redox reactions of sulfate minerals with petroleum. , The coexistence CO 2 and H 2 S also occurs during oil and gas production operations due to the sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRP) after secondary recovery by (sea) water flooding (see example in ref ) and thermal recovery/steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) via aquathermolysis (hydrolysis) (see example in ref ), which could cause serious reservoir souring and associated production issues such as internal corrosion in oil and gas pipelines, and pipeline failure, perforations, leaks, and cracks (see examples in refs ). It not only causes huge economic losses but also poses a serious safety and environmental concern because H 2 S is highly toxic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…existence is possible in oil field environments. Biocides like glutaraldehyde have been recommended for injection as a method of preventing H2S generation [7]. Because SRB grew in the covered microorganisms and the biocide was inactivated in the area around the film and the elements, this treatment was costly and had little to no impact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%