2014
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201402239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial Electroreduction: Screening for New Cathodic Biocatalysts

Abstract: Monohalo‐ and dihalodiynes efficiently undergo [2+2+2] cyclotrimerization with nitriles in the presence of a catalytic amount of the ruthenium complex Cp*RuCl(cod) (10 mol%) to afford the corresponding halopyridines under ambient conditions in good isolated yields (up to 90%). The halopyridines are formed as two separable regioisomers. This is the first example of a direct synthesis of halopyridines from haloalkynes and nitriles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Open squares are the corresponding current efficiencies Current densities reported for unbalanced fermentations are in the range of 55 μA/cm 2 for a S. oneidensis based microbial fuel cell in a modified bioreactor (Rosa et al, 2016). For cathodic processes where current is consumed and acetate or butyrate is produced using pure or mixed cultures, current densities range from several μA/cm 2 up to 3.7 mA/cm 2 (de Campos-Rodrigues & Rosenbaum, 2014;Ganigué, Puig, Batlle-Vilanova, Dolors Balaguer, & Colprim, 2015;Giddings, Nevin, Woodward, Lovley, & Butler, 2015;Jourdin et al, 2014). However, a Pseudomonas putida based anodic respiration process using an external mediator showed higher current densities (up to 12 mA/cm 2 ), where overpotentials at the electrodes play a greater role compared to the processes described before and need to be accounted for the electrochemical measurements (Hintermayer et al, 2016).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Electrochemical Losses In the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open squares are the corresponding current efficiencies Current densities reported for unbalanced fermentations are in the range of 55 μA/cm 2 for a S. oneidensis based microbial fuel cell in a modified bioreactor (Rosa et al, 2016). For cathodic processes where current is consumed and acetate or butyrate is produced using pure or mixed cultures, current densities range from several μA/cm 2 up to 3.7 mA/cm 2 (de Campos-Rodrigues & Rosenbaum, 2014;Ganigué, Puig, Batlle-Vilanova, Dolors Balaguer, & Colprim, 2015;Giddings, Nevin, Woodward, Lovley, & Butler, 2015;Jourdin et al, 2014). However, a Pseudomonas putida based anodic respiration process using an external mediator showed higher current densities (up to 12 mA/cm 2 ), where overpotentials at the electrodes play a greater role compared to the processes described before and need to be accounted for the electrochemical measurements (Hintermayer et al, 2016).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Electrochemical Losses In the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large efforts have been done to optimize known microbial catalysts for MES and to screen new ones with strong electroautotrophic properties (Rodrigues and Rosenbaum, 2014). Meanwhile, cathodes fabricated with novel materials or designed with better spatial arrangement are being explored and developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct electron transfer from the cathode to the microbial catalyst in the absence of a redox mediator has been shown to occur in MES processes driven by the following electroautotrophic species: A. ferrooxidans (Carbajosa et al, 2010; Rodrigues and Rosenbaum, 2014), M. ferrooxydans (Summers et al, 2013) and a group of acetogenic bacteria (Nevin et al, 2010, 2011; Nie et al, 2013; Zhang et al, 2013). This conclusion is mainly based on the fact that all these MES systems were operated with cathodes poised at potentials too high to produce significant quantity of H 2 .…”
Section: Electron Transfer From the Cathode To The Microbial Catalystmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several acetogenic bacteria, including Sporomusa ovata, Sporomusa silvacetica, Sporomusa sphaeroides, Sporumosa acidovorans, Sporumosa malonica, Clostridium ljungdahlii, Clostridium aceticum, and Moorella thermoacetica, can utilize the cathodic current for CO 2 reduction to organic acids (Nevin et al, 2011;Aryal et al, 2017). Also, some autotrophic sulfate-reducing microorganisms (SRM) have shown the ability to consume electrons from the cathode to accomplish sulfate reduction and hydrogen (H 2 ) production (Rodrigues and Rosenbaum, 2014;Beese-Vasbender et al, 2015b). However, overall fairly little research has been devoted toward this last group of electroautotrophic biocatalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%