2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial ecosystem and fermentation traits in the caecum of growing rabbits given diets varying in neutral detergent soluble and insoluble fibre levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies focused particularly on the analysis of the effects of the dietary fiber level on the whole cecal bacterial community in rabbits using molecular profiles (Michelland et al, 2010Monteils et al, 2008;Rodríguez-Romero, Abecia, & Fondevila, 2013). Our study showed that the cecal microbiota abundance increased significantly when NDF levels reached 350-400 g/kg (original matter basis) (p < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies focused particularly on the analysis of the effects of the dietary fiber level on the whole cecal bacterial community in rabbits using molecular profiles (Michelland et al, 2010Monteils et al, 2008;Rodríguez-Romero, Abecia, & Fondevila, 2013). Our study showed that the cecal microbiota abundance increased significantly when NDF levels reached 350-400 g/kg (original matter basis) (p < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Although the rabbit relies on the intake of large quantities of fiber that can be fermented by the microbiota found predominantly within the cecum, the change in NDF level does not affect the cecal pH and VFA concentration, which indicates no relation between quantity of NDF and concentration of VFA in the cecum (Bellier & Gidenne, ). Previous studies focused particularly on the analysis of the effects of the dietary fiber level on the whole cecal bacterial community in rabbits using molecular profiles (Michelland et al., , ; Monteils et al., ; Rodríguez‐Romero, Abecia, & Fondevila, ). Our study showed that the cecal microbiota abundance increased significantly when NDF levels reached 350–400 g/kg (original matter basis) ( p < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, differences in Jaccard but not Yue & Clayton indices suggest that changes in the community membership (addition or loss of members) occurred, but that this may have mainly involved low abundance members of community based on a lack of difference when relative abundance is considered. Other than the potential long-term microbiota adjustment to a new diet [42] the accumulated effect of meloxicam should also be considered, and in the absence of clinical or histologic abnormalities, only advanced molecular testing methods had the sensitivity to detect subtle changes in the rabbit’s GIT microbiota.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it is known that the fecal microbiome of laboratory raised rabbits is different from rabbits raised under other conditions (e.g. farms, households) [42-44]. As with similar studies, there is always the question of how well the fecal microbiome represents the microbiome in more proximal sections of the gastrointestinal tract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Badiola et al (2016) observed that the inoculation of rabbit kits with B. dorei reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and increased the expression of MHC II, a surface antigen, as well as increasing immunoglobulin diversity, thereby possibly helping reduce the risk of ERE. The prevalence of the genus Ruminococcus concurred with Bäuerl et al (2014), and R. albus, the most abundant species identified in this genus and 4 th most abundant overall, is generally recognised as being one of the main cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen environment and has been previously reported in the rabbit caecum (Abecia et al, 2005;Monteils et al, 2008;Rodríguez-Romero et al, 2013). In contrast, R. gnavus, the fifth most abundant species, does not appear to have been previously detected in rabbits.…”
Section: The Microbiota Profilementioning
confidence: 61%