1989
DOI: 10.1897/1552-8618(1989)8[1149:mdonoa]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial Degradation of Nitrogen, Oxygen and Sulfur Heterocyclic Compounds Under Anaerobic Conditions: Studies With Aquifer Samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nocardia (soil bacterium) was capable of using atrazine as the sole carbon and nitrogen source. It transformed atrazine into dealkylated and deaminated metabolites (Giardina et al, 1982;Kuhn and Suflita, 1989;Vaishampayan et al, 2007). In various biodegradation studies, dealkylation of both side chains was frequently observed over dechlorination by hydroxylation.…”
Section: Biodegradation Of Atrazinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nocardia (soil bacterium) was capable of using atrazine as the sole carbon and nitrogen source. It transformed atrazine into dealkylated and deaminated metabolites (Giardina et al, 1982;Kuhn and Suflita, 1989;Vaishampayan et al, 2007). In various biodegradation studies, dealkylation of both side chains was frequently observed over dechlorination by hydroxylation.…”
Section: Biodegradation Of Atrazinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no reports of anaerobic degradation of benzofuran, whereas furan was degraded in a methanogenic aquifer sample (Kuhn & Suflita 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study focuses on the biological degradation ofheterocyclic compounds, which constitute approximately 5% of creosote (Muelter et al 1989). However, due to their relatively high water solubility (Kuhn & Suflita 1989) and thus weak sorption they can amount to 35-40% of the water soluble fraction of creosote. Heterocyclic compounds are therefore potential ground water contaminants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, often two or more independent approaches are combined (Smets and Pritchard, 2003;Watanabe and Hamamuray, 2003), among these are evidence of concentration decrease of contaminants over time and distance (Wiedemeier et al, 1999), enrichment of heavy stable isotopes in the remaining fraction of organic contaminants (Hunkeler et al, 2002;Meckenstock et al, 2002;Sherwood Lollar et al, 1999), radiotracer studies (Bianchin et al, 2006;Conrad et al, 1997), succession of redox zones in the field (Kuhn and Suflita, 1989;Vroblesky and Chapelle, 1994); accumulation of signature metabolites (Beller, 2002;Elshahed et al, 2001), investigation of the intrinsic microbial biodegradation potential in microcosm studies e in parts with 14 C-labeled substrates e (Aelion and Bradley, 1991;Ambrosoli et al, 2005;Lovley, 2001); characterization of the bacterial community by molecular techniques (Amann et al, 1995;Bakermans et al, 2002), tracing 13 C in fatty acid profiles of bacteria (Geyer et al, 2005), and detection of bacterial enzymes (Hanson et al, 1999;Heinaru et al, 2005;Hendrickx et al, 2006;Löffler et al, 2000). Each of these methods has its advantages and limitations, and therefore it is advisable to base investigations on several approaches, even more when dealing with complex field sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%