2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2005.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial contamination of cell cultures: A 2 years study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent report obtained a 19% contamination rate by Mycoplasma species, although, by incorporating the mixed contamination results in which Mycoplasma was the main isolate, led to the Mycoplasma contamination rate rising to 22% (Mirjalili et al, 2005). However, in the present study our results revealed an overall Mycoplasma contamination of 4%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent report obtained a 19% contamination rate by Mycoplasma species, although, by incorporating the mixed contamination results in which Mycoplasma was the main isolate, led to the Mycoplasma contamination rate rising to 22% (Mirjalili et al, 2005). However, in the present study our results revealed an overall Mycoplasma contamination of 4%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…There are several recent reports of microbial contamination in cell cultures (Langdon, 2004;Mirjalili et al, 2005) and the most frequently isolated microorganisms are Mycoplasma, other bacteria from the human skin, airborne bacterial spores, airborne fungal spores and most infrequently gram negative bacteria (Halls, 2004;Owers et al, 2004). In our study, we observed that the majority of microorganisms recovered from stem cell cultures were saprophytic pathogens, which are inhabitants of normal human skin, mucosal, oropharynx and also in the environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Of these, Mycoplasma is considered as one of the major threats for cell cultures [2,3]. A recent study reported a 19% contamination rate by Mycoplasma species and the rate increased to 22% if the mixed contamination is taken into account, in which Mycoplasma is the main isolate [4]. Thus, Mycoplasma contamination can interfere with a number of biological parameters and influence the final data during routine cultivation or experimental investigation [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The standardised procedures and training protocols should be followed strictly on a timely basis. 13,51 Improper handling usually leads to mixing and contamination, and therefore utmost care should to taken by avoiding conversations, coughing, sneezing, spilling of medium on surfaces and accidental touching of pipettes to surfaces. [52][53][54] …”
Section: Elimination and Prevention Of Microbial Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contamination is reported to spread through airborne particles and non-sterile surfaces mainly. 13 In a study on fibroblasts and keratinocyte cell lines, 32.35% cultures were contaminated, and among these, the mycoplasma contaminated cultures were 17.65%, followed by fungal (8.82%) and bacterial (5.88%) contaminants.14 Aspergillus tops the list of fungal contamination of cell cultures. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%