2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.04.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial compositional changes in broiler chicken cecal contents from birds challenged with different Salmonella vaccine candidate strains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, Qu et al showed that metavirulomes of the microbiomes seemed to be affected by the host species (Qu et al, 2008), which supports the metagenomic data reported by Deblais et al, where distinct prophage profiles were observed in S. Heidelberg isolates collected from chickenand turkey-farm environments (Deblais et al, 2018b). Several metagenomics studies also analyzed the impact of specific treatments such as a novel anti-Salmonella growth inhibitor (PubChem ID: 2834410, 2847561, 2848076, and 9586485) (Deblais et al, 2018a), S. Typhimurium attenuated vaccines (ΔΔmetRmetD and P BAD-mviN ) (Park et al, 2017), and antibiotic growth promoters (bacitracin, dimethyl salicylate, or enrofloxacin) Kumar et al, 2018) on the gut microbiota and the persistence of Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp.…”
Section: Miseqsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Further, Qu et al showed that metavirulomes of the microbiomes seemed to be affected by the host species (Qu et al, 2008), which supports the metagenomic data reported by Deblais et al, where distinct prophage profiles were observed in S. Heidelberg isolates collected from chickenand turkey-farm environments (Deblais et al, 2018b). Several metagenomics studies also analyzed the impact of specific treatments such as a novel anti-Salmonella growth inhibitor (PubChem ID: 2834410, 2847561, 2848076, and 9586485) (Deblais et al, 2018a), S. Typhimurium attenuated vaccines (ΔΔmetRmetD and P BAD-mviN ) (Park et al, 2017), and antibiotic growth promoters (bacitracin, dimethyl salicylate, or enrofloxacin) Kumar et al, 2018) on the gut microbiota and the persistence of Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp.…”
Section: Miseqsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Likewise, the effects of live vaccines on microbiota were confounded by overlapping vaccination timelines and could not be elucidated in this study. However, under experimental conditions, live vaccines have been associated with significant changes in microbiota compositions (61,62). Such changes may have long-term effects on immunity to unrelated pathogens and production performance (6,63).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control challenge and prebiotic challenge groups were not significantly different starting from 7 dpi, suggesting that while the microbiome was initially different challenging the birds with Salmonella lead to a similar microbiome regardless of bird treatment background. Changes in cecum microbiome have been reported in birds given candidate Salmonella vaccine strains ( 37 ), and infection with Salmonella has also been shown to modify the natural development of the chicken microbiota ( 38 ). The control un-challenged birds remain distinct from the other treatment groups throughout.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%