2012
DOI: 10.1128/aem.01892-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial Community Dynamics of an Urban Drinking Water Distribution System Subjected to Phases of Chloramination and Chlorination Treatments

Abstract: Water utilities in parts of the U.S. control microbial regrowth in drinking water distribution systems (DWDS) by alternating postdisinfection methods between chlorination and chloramination. To examine how this strategy influences drinking water microbial communities, an urban DWDS (population Х 40,000) with groundwater as the source water was studied for approximately 2 years. Water samples were collected at five locations in the network at different seasons and analyzed for their chemical and physical charac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
103
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
10
103
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that seasonal water temperature fluctuation is the likely reason (Supplementary Figure S1B); however, further Drinking water distribution system microbiota F Ling et al studies are needed for better elucidation. Other engineering factors examined in this study did not appear to affect the biofilm communities as significantly, although disinfectant type had been reported previously to affect the structure of suspended communities in the DWDS ecosystem (Hwang et al, 2012b;Wang et al, 2014). A plausible explanation for this observation is that the biofilms in DWDS, because of the long-term community assemblage discussed above and reduced disinfectant penetration yielded by the polymeric biofilm matrix (Chen and Stewart, 1996), are likely resistant to certain perturbations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We hypothesize that seasonal water temperature fluctuation is the likely reason (Supplementary Figure S1B); however, further Drinking water distribution system microbiota F Ling et al studies are needed for better elucidation. Other engineering factors examined in this study did not appear to affect the biofilm communities as significantly, although disinfectant type had been reported previously to affect the structure of suspended communities in the DWDS ecosystem (Hwang et al, 2012b;Wang et al, 2014). A plausible explanation for this observation is that the biofilms in DWDS, because of the long-term community assemblage discussed above and reduced disinfectant penetration yielded by the polymeric biofilm matrix (Chen and Stewart, 1996), are likely resistant to certain perturbations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Owing to a robust water treatment process, the product water supplied into the DWDS generally maintained stable water chemistry (Hwang et al, 2012b). Water quality monitoring across multiple sites in the distribution system also showed stable pH and turbidity (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a remarkably high abundance of candidate phyla was discovered in the present study. Candidate phyla and difficult-to-classify sequences were already observed previously in some chlorinated drinking water systems in high and low abundances (Eichler et al, 2006;Henne et al, 2012a;Hong et al, 2010;Revetta et al, 2010;Hwang et al, 2012). Nevertheless, up to now different methodologies with variations in their sensitivity have been used to study the microbial community composition of drinking water.…”
Section: Microbial Community Structure and Biological Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metagenomics has been successfully used to investigate bacterial communities present in end-use tap water, experimental drinking water systems, and bacterial biofilms within pipes (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). However, very few studies have explored bacterial communities throughout full-scale DWDSs or investigated community variations between different systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%