Microbial Biodiversity: Approaches to Experimental Design and Hypothesis Testing in Primary Scientific Literature from 1975 to 1999

Abstract

Research interest in microbial biodiversity over the past 25 years has increased markedly as microbiologists have become interested in the significance of biodiversity for ecological processes and as the industrial, medical, and agricultural applications of this diversity have evolved. One major challenge for studies of microbial habitats is how to account for the diversity of extremely large and heterogeneous populations with samples that represent only a very small fraction of these populations. This review presents an analysis of the way in which the field of microbial biodiversity has exploited sampling, experimental design, and the process of hypothesis testing to meet this challenge. This review is based on a systematic analysis of 753 publications randomly sampled from the primary scientific literature from 1975 to 1999 concerning the microbial biodiversity of eight habitats related to water, soil, plants, and food. These publications illustrate a dominant and growing interest in questions concerning the effect of specific environmental factors on microbial biodiversity, the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of this biodiversity, and quantitative measures of population structure for most of the habitats covered here. Nevertheless, our analysis reveals that descriptions of sampling strategies or other information concerning the representativeness of the sample are often missing from publications, that there is very limited use of statistical tests of hypotheses, and that only a very few publications report the results of multiple independent tests of hypotheses. Examples are cited of different approaches and constraints to experimental design and hypothesis testing in studies of microbial biodiversity. To prompt a more rigorous approach to unambiguous evaluation of the impact of microbial biodiversity on ecological processes, we present guidelines for reporting information about experimental design, sampling strategies, and analyses of results in publications concerning microbial biodiversity

Global Sequencing: A Review of Current Molecular Data and New Methods Available to Assess Microbial Diversity

“…・Evaluate the taxonomic attribution of each tag in order to try to figure out the ecological role of each bacteria and the functioning of the community as a whole. Over time there has been numerous reviews of the methods available for studying microbial diversity 13,25,41,42,46,64,65,67,73,83,86,98,107,117,124,131,135,143,162,166,167,171,180,186) . Each method may have advantages and pitfalls, and there has been a tendency in recent years to simultaneously use several approaches, in order to obtain an extended view of the bacterial populations of complex ecosystems because some abundant species can be not retrieved by one of the methods 35,38,78,91) .…”

A Review of Indicators of Healthy Agricultural Soils with Pea Footrot Disease Suppression Potentials

“…Hence our understanding of the significance of biodiversity for ecological processes in the microbial world or of the ways, in which we can manipulate or manage this diversity, is largely still unknown (Bull & Stach, 2004;Rosselló-Mora and Kämper, 2004;Tilman et al, 1997;Yachi & Loreau, 1999). Morris et al (2002) have largely attributed this failure or setback to problems associated with experimental designs and testing of hypothesis in ecological research. This notwithstanding, researchers have generally defined biological diversity at three levels of complexity:…”

Long-term agrichemical use leads to alterations in bacterial community diversity

“…Since alterations of the composition of the microbial community can be linked with functional changes in soil ecology, the soil bacterial community is an ideal indicator for the ecological status of soil and can thus help to evaluate how environmental and anthropogenic factors influence the soil ecosystem (Morris et al 2002). Although previous work has revealed that either chemical inputs (Kleineidam et al 2010) or plants (Berg and Smalla 2009) can affect soil microbial communities, few studies have evaluated the combined influence of agricultural chemical inputs and plant on bacterial community structure (Garcia-Teijeiro et al 2009, Doi et al 2011.…”