2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-019-09963-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial assemblages and bioindicators as proxies for ecosystem health status: potential and limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The globally biogeographic microbial assemblages could have potential to be efficient biological indicators for the environmental health of the complex natural systems (Astudillo-Garcia et al, 2019). Therefore, revealing microbial biogeography and mechanisms underlying community assembly is a central issue in microbial ecology (Nemergut et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The globally biogeographic microbial assemblages could have potential to be efficient biological indicators for the environmental health of the complex natural systems (Astudillo-Garcia et al, 2019). Therefore, revealing microbial biogeography and mechanisms underlying community assembly is a central issue in microbial ecology (Nemergut et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the other OTUs are from the Phyla Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria. Many of the lowest distinct taxa we identified have previously been discussed as bioindicators for general ecosystem quality (Ignavibacteriales (Cordier, 2019), Limnobacter (Yang et al, 2019), and Sandaracinaceae (Wei et al, 2019)), certain environmental variables ( Opitutus (Puranik et al, 2016; Plassart et al, 2019), Alcaligenaceae (Sharuddin et al, 2017), Novosphingobium (Astudillo‐García et al, 2019; Reis et al, 2020), and NS11‐12 marine group (Coclet et al, 2019; Henson et al, 2018)), and human interference/impact/pollution ( Actibacter (Kegler et al, 2018), Fluviicola (Chen et al, 2019), and SC‐I‐84 (Pershina et al, 2015)). However, not all of these taxa have previously been identified in lake ecosystems, and most of the OTUs among these bacterial multitask bioindicators are assigned to taxa originally isolated from soil ecosystems (see Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Most of the other OTUs are from the Phyla Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria. Many of the lowest distinct taxa we identified have previously been discussed as bioindicators for general ecosystem quality (Ignavibacteriales [36], Limnobacter [64], and Sandaracinaceae [65]), certain environmental parameters (Opitutus [17,66], Alcaligenaceae [67], Novosphingobium [68,69], and NS11-12 marine group [70,71]), and human interference/impact/pollution (Actibacter [72], Fluviicola [73], and SC-I-84 [74]). However, not all of these taxa have previously been identified in lake ecosystems, and most of the OTUs among these bacterial multi-task bioindicators are assigned to taxa originally isolated from soil ecosystems (see table 3).…”
Section: Analysis Of Microbial Multi-task Bioindicatorsmentioning
confidence: 94%