2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2008.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microarray for molecular typing of Salmonella enterica serovars

Abstract: We describe the development of a spotted array for the delineation of the most common 14 disease causing Salmonella serovars in the United States. Our array consists of 414 70mers targeting core genes of S. enterica, subspecies I specific genes, fimbrial genes, pathogenicity islands, Gifsy elements and other variable genes. Using this array we were able to identify a unique gene presence/absence profile for each of the targeted serovar which was used as the serovar differentiating criteria. Based on this profi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While 16S rRNA gene sequences have been used to type isolates to the subspecies level (29), molecular serogrouping required the simultaneous interrogation of gene clusters involved in Salmonella antigen biosynthesis, such as the rfb genes for various O antigens (9). DNA microarray-based typing has revealed the presence of groups of serovar-specific genes (20,22) and multiplex PCR assays (12,16), and panels (1) intending to differentiate among the different serovars have been published. Although a commercial low-density DNA microarray for the identification of Salmonella serovars has been marketed, it failed to distinguish between some serovars and was not tested using S. Typhi (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 16S rRNA gene sequences have been used to type isolates to the subspecies level (29), molecular serogrouping required the simultaneous interrogation of gene clusters involved in Salmonella antigen biosynthesis, such as the rfb genes for various O antigens (9). DNA microarray-based typing has revealed the presence of groups of serovar-specific genes (20,22) and multiplex PCR assays (12,16), and panels (1) intending to differentiate among the different serovars have been published. Although a commercial low-density DNA microarray for the identification of Salmonella serovars has been marketed, it failed to distinguish between some serovars and was not tested using S. Typhi (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of recent strategies have employed PCR-based approaches to determine different O and H antigens as a means to replace serologic identification of these antigens (14,20,25,32). Others have proposed alternative strategies examining genetic differences as a means of identifying serovars, including ribotyping (17), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (28), multiplex PCR (3,4,29), IS200 analysis (18,46), random amplification of DNA polymorphisms (45), and DNA microarray analysis (38,42).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 This technology has been used in highthroughput detection of pathogens, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus in hospitals, 44 and in the identification of antimicrobial resistance genes. 16,36 More recently, 3 studies 29,42,50 have focused on molecular serotyping of Salmonella using microarray protocols. These microarrays could identify only a limited number of serovars and required multiple probe sets for each serovar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%