2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microarray analysis of gene expression in adult retinal ganglion cells

Abstract: Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) transfer visual information to the brain and are known to be susceptible to selective degeneration in various neuropathies such as glaucoma. This selective vulnerability suggests that these highly specialized neurons possess a distinct gene expression profile that becomes altered by neuropathy-associated stresses, which lead to the RGC death. In this study, to identify genes expressed predominantly in adult RGCs, a global transcriptional profile of purified primary RGCs has been c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data greatly extend the single time point snapshots of gene expression we and others have published previously for RGCs (Farkas et al, 2004;Fischer et al, 2004;Ivanov et al, 2006) and allowed comparison with development surveys of gene expression in other CNS neurons, including striatal (Lobo et al, 2006) and cortical (Arlotta et al, 2005) projection neurons. Interestingly, it appears that the genes that are developmentally regulated in each of these three populations are almost entirely different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These data greatly extend the single time point snapshots of gene expression we and others have published previously for RGCs (Farkas et al, 2004;Fischer et al, 2004;Ivanov et al, 2006) and allowed comparison with development surveys of gene expression in other CNS neurons, including striatal (Lobo et al, 2006) and cortical (Arlotta et al, 2005) projection neurons. Interestingly, it appears that the genes that are developmentally regulated in each of these three populations are almost entirely different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Analysis of the FACS results showed a 2:1 stoichiometry in the yields of small (6-13 μm) vs large (15-25 μm) cells, which is consistent with the ratios reported by other investigators (Kashiwagi et al 2000). Relatively high yields of undegraded, high-quality RNA from both sub-populations were consistently obtained, for which the quality and cell type-specificity of the extracted RNA were determined by BioAnalyzer and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) amplification of several single copy genes, including Thy1, Gfap, Cd11b, Cd68 as described earlier (Ivanov et al 2006). …”
Section: Quality Of Cell Purificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyzed only those genes that passed several Agilent-recommended quality control criteria, as described previously (17). To determine differential gene expression, the "naïve RGC-5/reference RNA" ratios were divided by the ratios of "silenced RGC-5/reference RNA."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA Amplification, Labeling, and Array HybridizationAmplification was performed using the Amino Allyl MessageAmp TM Kit (Ambion) that is configured to incorporate the modified nucleotide 5-(3-aminoallyl)-UTP (aaUTP) into the aRNA during in vitro transcription, as described previously (17). Prior to amplification, the RNA quality was tested in each sample using the NanoDrop and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%