2009
DOI: 10.1261/rna.1677409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microarray analysis of cytoplasmic versus whole cell RNA reveals a considerable number of missed and false positive mRNAs

Abstract: With no known exceptions, every published microarray study to determine differential mRNA levels in eukaryotes used RNA extracted from whole cells. It is assumed that the use of whole cell RNA in microarray gene expression analysis provides a legitimate profile of steady-state mRNA. Standard labeling methods and the prevailing dogma that mRNA resides almost exclusively in the cytoplasm has led to the long-standing belief that the nuclear RNA contribution is negligible. We report that unadulterated cytoplasmic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the small number of the analyzed RNAs, these results suggest that the AGCCC motif may play a role in nuclear localization of additional lncRNAs and proteincoding RNAs. It is known that a significant fraction of the transcript population of many protein-coding RNAs is nucleus-localized (66,67), and at least in some cases, nuclear retention is used as a means for regulation of the level of translation (68,69). In addition, increasing evidence suggests that the protein-coding RNAs have functions beyond merely coding for proteins, and indeed, many of them may regulate cellular processes as functional RNAs (70).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the small number of the analyzed RNAs, these results suggest that the AGCCC motif may play a role in nuclear localization of additional lncRNAs and proteincoding RNAs. It is known that a significant fraction of the transcript population of many protein-coding RNAs is nucleus-localized (66,67), and at least in some cases, nuclear retention is used as a means for regulation of the level of translation (68,69). In addition, increasing evidence suggests that the protein-coding RNAs have functions beyond merely coding for proteins, and indeed, many of them may regulate cellular processes as functional RNAs (70).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear RNA was obtained from nuclear extracts by the same method (Trask et al 2009). Polyadenylated RNA was isolated from 1 mg total RNA with an mRNA Purification Kit (GE Healthcare).…”
Section: Rna Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear extract (Trask et al 2009) from siRNA-treated U2OS cells was loaded on a linear 10%-45% sucrose gradient (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 ). After centrifugation in a SW40Ti rotor (Beckman) at 40,000 rpm and 4°C for 4 h, 18 fractions were collected.…”
Section: Gradient Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factors can also contribute to the limited overlap between the two sets of data, including the differences inherent to each technique and the use of a different starting material for microarray and deep sequencing (cytoplasmic vs. total extracts, respectively). Large differences have been reported in a recent microarray analysis comparing whole-cell versus cytoplasmic RNA (Trask et al 2009). These investigators found that up to 31% of the differentially expressed genes detected using cytoplasmic RNA can be missed by using total RNA and that the contribution of the nuclear RNA to total RNA variation is far from negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These data indicate that the variation between independent biological replicates is relatively small and thus should contribute little to the limited overlap between the RIP-Chip and RIP-seq data. Other factors such as the use of total versus cytoplasmic RNA have the potential to contribute more decisively, because large variations have been recently reported when these two types of starting material are compared in gene expression studies using microarrays (Trask et al 2009) (see Discussion).…”
Section: à6mentioning
confidence: 99%