2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-012-9163-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microarchaeological Approaches to the Identification and Interpretation of Combustion Features in Prehistoric Archaeological Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
134
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
3
134
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of hearth sediments can inform us about mobility, subsistence behaviors, and activity areas of hunter-gatherer societies (11,12). Recent analyses of burned residues in hearths have demonstrated their value for exploring associated food use; however, these investigations have focused on examining the use of animal bone and marine animal blubber for fuel and lighting at locations proximal to coastal environments (13)(14)(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of hearth sediments can inform us about mobility, subsistence behaviors, and activity areas of hunter-gatherer societies (11,12). Recent analyses of burned residues in hearths have demonstrated their value for exploring associated food use; however, these investigations have focused on examining the use of animal bone and marine animal blubber for fuel and lighting at locations proximal to coastal environments (13)(14)(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hearth context deposits consist of bedded intact hearths, interspersed with disorganized deposits of mixed ash and clay. We interpret the latter as evidence for the raking out of hearth features and/or trampling (Goldberg 2003;Karkanas et al 2015;Meignen et al 2007;Mentzer 2014). Both the faunal and lithic materials were burned at higher rates in the hearth context as compared to the breccias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The presences of wood ash crystals as well as their aggregated porous nature and variability in the orientation of elongated particles suggests that the upper bone breccia is the result of dumping activities of mostly hearth remains (e.g. Goldberg 2003;Meignen et al 2007;Mentzer 2014), though this does not exclude the possibility that some butchery debris was also discarded in this part of the site. One difference between the upper and lower bone breccias is that the lower contains fewer large pieces of burned bone, which corroborates the zooarchaeological results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In archaeological contexts, micromorphology has proven to be especially useful for several relevant aspects of the archaeological record interpretation, such as the distinction between anthropogenic and natural processes (Aldeias et al 2014;Mallol et al 2010;Goldberg et al 2003;Karkanas 2002), including the nature and significance of stratigraphic contacts and discontinuities (Mallol and Mentzer 2015). It has been particularly successful in the identification and assessment of the degree of preservation of anthropogenic features, such as combustion features (Mentzer 2014;Aldeias et al 2012) and occupational surfaces-including Mesolithic ones (Zerboni 2011)-and the recognition of human activities such as bedding, trampling (Goldberg et al 2009;Miller et al 2013) or intentional reworking of debris (Shillito et al 2011;Sherwood and Kidder 2011). These types of activities are very often only discernible at this microscopic scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%