Phytoplankton Pigments 2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511732263.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microalgal classes and their signature pigments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
175
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 202 publications
8
175
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pigment data was analysed by CHEMTAX following Higgins et al (2011), with chemotaxonomic groups being identified according to Jeffrey et al (2011). Pigment starting ratios were obtained from Higgins et al (2011) and functional groups included the following: diatoms-1, dinoflagellates-1, cryptophytes, pelagophytes, haptophytes-6, prasinophytes-1, cyanobacteria (Synechococcus spp.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pigment data was analysed by CHEMTAX following Higgins et al (2011), with chemotaxonomic groups being identified according to Jeffrey et al (2011). Pigment starting ratios were obtained from Higgins et al (2011) and functional groups included the following: diatoms-1, dinoflagellates-1, cryptophytes, pelagophytes, haptophytes-6, prasinophytes-1, cyanobacteria (Synechococcus spp.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a considerable increase in knowledge regarding phytoplankton pigments over the previous two decades (Jeffrey et al, 2011), and also in the evolution of statistical techniques such as CHEMTAX that allows more information to be gained regarding the diversity of groups contributing to the phytoplankton biomass (Higgins et al, 2011). The AMT-6 surface pigment data has therefore been reanalysed using CHEMTAX enabling greater detail to be elucidated concerning the phytoplankton groups than was reported by Barlow et al (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) were further investigated by examining the representative pigment ratios of 19′ hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin (marker for haptophytes, Jeffrey et al, 2011), 19-butanoyloxyfucoxanthin (marker for pelagophytes, Jeffrey et al, 2011) and alloxanthin (marker for cryptophytes). The largest changes were observed in ratio of 19′hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin to DP (haptophytes), with a significant increase in the NATL and decrease in the SATL (Fig.…”
Section: Phytoplankton Pigment Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some diagnostic pigments such as fucoxanthin (main indicator of diatoms) may also be found in some flagellates (Jeffrey et al, 2011;Vidussi et al, 2001) and the pigment groupings do not strictly reflect the true size of phytoplankton (Uitz et al, 2006). Brewin et al (2014a) conducted a comparison of sizefractionated chlorophyll estimated independently from HPLC diagnostic pigment analysis and from size-fractionated filtration (SFF) along the AMT transect.…”
Section: Implications Of Modifications In the Relationship Between Psmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slight modifications were made in order to account for the presence of the pigment aphanizophyll (Apha). This carotenoid has only been found in cyanobacteria to date Jeffrey et al, 2011) and is regarded a potential marker pigment for diazotrophs (Louda et al, 2015). However, Apha has also been detected in the non-diazotrophic freshwater species Microcystis aeruginosa , which suggests that the detection of Apha might not necessarily indicate the presence of diazotrophic cyanobacteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%