1995
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.18.4.572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microalbuminuria and Potential Confounders: A review and some observations on variability of urinary albumin excretion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
109
0
18

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
109
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…A limitation of our study is that MA was assessed on one overnight sample. It is well known that there is considerable intra-individual variability in urinary albumin excretion in time (33). As a consequence, the prevalence of MA in our study may have been significantly both underestimated as well as overestimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…A limitation of our study is that MA was assessed on one overnight sample. It is well known that there is considerable intra-individual variability in urinary albumin excretion in time (33). As a consequence, the prevalence of MA in our study may have been significantly both underestimated as well as overestimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Although the A/C ratio is accepted as an alternative to detect the presence of microalbuminuria, urinary creatinine excretion depends on the amount of muscle mass, which is variable for several biological parameters (gender, age, body weight, exercise). 37 This could be a reason that these studies did not find an interaction of CRP and blood pressure, which is also related to these parameters, with the risk of microalbuminuria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Even in the absence of factors identified with variation in albumin excretion, such as increased physical activity, the level of albumin excretion can vary by 40% from day to day and more variation is induced by the use of ACR. 46,56 This variation would most likely have had the effect of attenuating the relationships between urinary albumin and systolic blood pressure and may cause some misclassification of the level of MAU. As with all crosssection studies a causal relationship between elevated SBP and elevated ACR can not be inferred from the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%