Introduction: Properly trained standardized patients (SPs) are able to realistically perform their roles with high accuracy. 1 Not only is it important for SPs to portray a consistent affect, it is equally important that SPs are accurate in their assessments of learners when completing checklists after encounters. 2 Videotape review of case portrayal during training has been shown to improve role accuracy. 3 Our institution explored further improving SP performance on checklists, portrayals, debriefing techniques and improved SP confidence by having SPs watch and assess videos of their own performances. Methods: As a part of our case training, we have found reviewing videos of previous encounters as a group to be an effective tool for both case portrayal and checklist calibration. Normally, SPs are not shown their own portrayals in front of others. However, we thought that they might benefit from watching their own encounters individually for things like affect, case information, and checklist accuracy. We started to implement self-review with SPs as a tool for ensuring accurate portrayals of their cases as well as their recall for checklists. SPs watched their own encounters, completed the same checklists, and compared the two notating any discrepancies. After SPs completed this exercise, coordinators informally debriefed with them. Results: The SPs reported that the exercise enabled them to understand why certain discrepancies occurred. Coordinators also noted that SP portrayals seemed more consistent after the self-reviews and that checklist accuracy may have improved. SPs also reported greater satisfaction and confidence after the self-reviews.Having SPs review videos of their own performance requires very little effort on the part of the SP coordinators for setup and implementation while providing an effective, positive experience for the SPs. Conclusion: Our institution observed benefits in having SPs view their own past encounters. This can be a useful tool in SP training. In the future, we plan to more formally assess the efficacy of this protocol with a randomized controlled study. References: 1. Erby, LA, Roter DL, and Biesecker BB: Examination of standardized patient performance: accuracy and consistency of six standardized patients over time.