1991
DOI: 10.1016/0032-5910(91)80035-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-visualization of clusters in a fast fluidized bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For dilute flows such as in risers, however, micro-scale and meso-scale overlap and no clear length scale separation can be distinguished (l = 0.88 mm > d cl = 0.25 mm, for s = 0.01). In fact, micro-visualization also suggests that the size of particle structure is highly variable, spanning from few particles to nearly the reactor diameter (Li et al, 1991). In such cases, meso-scale is not so distinct from micro-and macro-scales.…”
Section: Why Structure-dependent Drag Force?mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For dilute flows such as in risers, however, micro-scale and meso-scale overlap and no clear length scale separation can be distinguished (l = 0.88 mm > d cl = 0.25 mm, for s = 0.01). In fact, micro-visualization also suggests that the size of particle structure is highly variable, spanning from few particles to nearly the reactor diameter (Li et al, 1991). In such cases, meso-scale is not so distinct from micro-and macro-scales.…”
Section: Why Structure-dependent Drag Force?mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Tuzla et al (1998) indicated that clusters also exist in the downflow of the solids in the downer. Experimental measurements of cluster velocity and length have been reported by researchers (e.g., Horio et al, 1988;Li et al, 1991;Soong et al, 1995) and correlations are also available for estimating the cluster size (e.g., Xu and Kato, 1999). However, almost no attention has been paid to clusters in dense bed due to more complex flow structure of solids in the dense bed of bubbling and turbulent fluidized beds compared to that of fast fluidization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With respect to the impact of operating conditions, Figure 168 shows that the effect of the four operating conditions investigated on cluster appearance probability is generally insignificant. It is noted in previous work that cluster appearance probability increases (Brereton and Grace 1993;Zou, Li et al 1994; Wei, Yang et al 1995;Manyele, Parssinen et al 2002), decreases (Li, Xia et al 1991), or is insensitive (Li, Zhu et al 1995) to an increase of solid loading (m); these seemingly contradictory previous results can again be traced to data obtained from only a limited portion of the riser and lacking local details. For example, comparing Figure 168c and d at h/H = 0.16 reveals that increasing m increases appearance probability at the wall (r/R = 1) but decreases apperance probbility at the center (r/R = 0), which implies that a lack of a more complete dataset may lead to opposite trends; whereas the complete landscape given in Figure 168 shows clearly that the small change due to m is insignificant compared to the greater profile variations associated with the effect of riser height.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%