2017
DOI: 10.1364/ol.42.004454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-pulse polarization lidar at 15  μm using a single superconducting nanowire single-photon detector

Abstract: An all-fiber, eye-safe and micro-pulse polarization lidar is demonstrated with a polarization-maintaining structure, incorporating a single superconducting nanowire single-photon detector (SNSPD) at 1.5 μm. The time-division multiplexing technique is used to achieve a calibration-free optical layout. A single piece of detector is used to detect the backscatter signals at two orthogonal states in an alternative sequence. Thus, regular calibration of the two detectors in traditional polarization lidars is avoide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for the differences in the relationships between BLH and PM2.5 under different pollutant and weather conditions need further studies. This required more data based on different instruments, such as horizontal wind field (Shangguan et al, 2017), temperature profiles (Mattis et al, 2002), and depolarization ratio of aerosol (Qiu et al, 2017) in ABL. The application of such an integrated lidar in this research will contribute to our understanding of ABL and aerosol-cloudprecipitation interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for the differences in the relationships between BLH and PM2.5 under different pollutant and weather conditions need further studies. This required more data based on different instruments, such as horizontal wind field (Shangguan et al, 2017), temperature profiles (Mattis et al, 2002), and depolarization ratio of aerosol (Qiu et al, 2017) in ABL. The application of such an integrated lidar in this research will contribute to our understanding of ABL and aerosol-cloudprecipitation interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for the differences in the relationships between BLH and PM 2.5 may result from both cloud effect and pollutant sources and not just from the precipitation. This required more data based on different instruments, such as horizontal wind field (Shangguan et al, 2017), temperature profiles (Mattis et al, 2002), and the depolarisation ratio of aerosol (Qiu et al, 2017) and pollutant components in the ABL. To probe the mechanism of the BLH-PM 2.5 relations under different conditions, such as before and after the precipitation, not only these observations but also model simulations are needed in further studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, lidar are widely used in the lower atmosphere via Mie scattering, Raman scattering and differential absorption (Campbell et al, 2002;Godin et al, 1989;Murray and van der Laan, 1978;Reitebuch, 2012;Renaut et al, 1980;Xia et al, 2007). Aerosol, trace gas concentration, atmospheric density, temperature and wind can be detected by these lidar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polarization lidar has shown the capability of identifying different types of aerosols and clouds by analyzing the linear depolarization ratio (LDR). Taking advantage of the lowest attenuation (<1 dB/km) in the fiber and the maturity of optical devices at optical communication band, an allfiber eye-safe polarization lidar incorporating a time-division multiplexing (TDM) technique is developed [7]. Only a single piece of the detector is used to detect the backscatter signals at two orthogonal states in an alternative sequence.…”
Section: Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%