2009
DOI: 10.1117/12.839707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-milling process improvement using an agile pulse-shaping fiber laser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pulses from this regime may be useful for remote sensing (e.g. spectrally sensitive LIDAR [20]) and machining applications [21]. In addition to the pulse width variations introduced through modifying the pump power, the pulse width would change with cavity loss.…”
Section: Oscillator Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulses from this regime may be useful for remote sensing (e.g. spectrally sensitive LIDAR [20]) and machining applications [21]. In addition to the pulse width variations introduced through modifying the pump power, the pulse width would change with cavity loss.…”
Section: Oscillator Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given spot size and a given average power at constant repetition rate, the flexibility of the MOPAW laser platform allows for changing the pulse peak power density through the control of the pulse duration at constant pulse energy density [8] (see Table 2). In those conditions, longer pulses will result in lower pulse peak power densities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an electro-optic modulator as a pulse picker, the repetition rate of the pulse train could be reduced from 200 kHz down to 400 Hz, leading to a pulse-to-pulse overlap of approximately 57% and a dose of ~2 shots/spot. [8] Operation at 200 kHz increased the dose by a factor of 500. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we note that ablative removal of material by way of vaporisation is significantly less efficient than that suggested by Eq. (1) and depends strongly on pulse energy and duration [32,33]. Experimentally it has been shown that in practice, ablation processes using nanosecond pulsed lasers are at best 48% efficient [32].…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%