2004
DOI: 10.1177/030089160409000125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-Melanoma Detection. A Clinical Study on 22 Cases of Melanoma with a Diameter Equal to or Less than 3 MM

Abstract: Dermoscopy appears to be an efficient aid to the diagnosis of micro-melanomas, provided that clinicians are aware of this type of lesion and maintain the index of suspicion at a high level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
71
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the “ugly duckling” is usually a sign typical of melanoma [7], all existing melanocytic lesions must undergo dermoscopic evaluation, regardless of their location and size. According to Bono et al melanomas are more frequently diagnosed among minor melanocytic lesions (less than 3 mm in size) than among those of greater diameter, which usually spark more concern among patients [8,9]. So-called “micromelanomas” in the form of foci measuring less than 3 mm in diameter constituted 2.4% of all examined melanomas (22 of 924 cases of primary foci of melanoma) [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the “ugly duckling” is usually a sign typical of melanoma [7], all existing melanocytic lesions must undergo dermoscopic evaluation, regardless of their location and size. According to Bono et al melanomas are more frequently diagnosed among minor melanocytic lesions (less than 3 mm in size) than among those of greater diameter, which usually spark more concern among patients [8,9]. So-called “micromelanomas” in the form of foci measuring less than 3 mm in diameter constituted 2.4% of all examined melanomas (22 of 924 cases of primary foci of melanoma) [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meanings of the A, B, C, and E in the Georgia approach are unchanged from usual use: “A” for “Asymmetry,” “B” for “Border irregularity,” “C” for “Color variation,” and “E” for “Evolving” unlike other lesions. What is critical to the utility of the ABCDE criteria, however, is the change of the “D” to signify “Dark” and not “6 mm Diameter.” With this change, and without altering the familiar mnemonic, the criterion never present in the earliest melanomas is replaced by the single criterion that characterizes many early melanomas [11,16,17]. It can now be stated more accurately that most melanomas have one or more of the ABCDE criteria and that the criteria are relevant to the diagnosis of early melanomas.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymmetry is a criterion for such diagnoses (described in clinical and dermoscopic ABCD rules), but MM lesions smaller than 3 mm in diameter may be symmetrical or asymmetrical. 10-12 We should also remember that small lesions may not develop the spectrum of clinical, dermoscopical, and histopathological characteristics. Hence, careful surveillance, especially in risk groups, is justified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%