2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-mechanical analysis of caisson foundation in sand using DEM: Particle breakage effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where a defines the magnitude of anisotropy and θa defines the direction of anisotropy (Rothenburg & Bathurst, 1989;Wang & Yin, 2020). The parameter a can be fitted from the contact orientation distribution using Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a defines the magnitude of anisotropy and θa defines the direction of anisotropy (Rothenburg & Bathurst, 1989;Wang & Yin, 2020). The parameter a can be fitted from the contact orientation distribution using Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pipe segment was implemented via finite element mesh (triangular geometry) as a circular cylinder (the number of vertices was 6888), and the mechanical parameters for the pipe were based on the elastic properties of steel. In DEM-based simulations, particle size in the numerical simulation is usually much larger than that in model tests while the span of particle size distribution is narrower to obtain an acceptable computational cost, especially for three-dimensional engineering structure-soil interaction simulations, as presented in previous studies [34,38,[52][53][54]. The diameters of particles in this simulation were between 12 and 24 mm while the median particle diameter (d 50 ) was 16 mm, generated by the gravity deposition method [55].…”
Section: Methodology Of Coupled Dem-femmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that unacceptable computational efficiency will result if particle details in a DEM simulation are the same as those in model tests [34,38,[52][53][54]. Therefore, it is widely accepted that, in DEM-based simulations, many factors such as particle size, shape, and size distribution are simplified compared to those observed in model tests, in order to achieve acceptable computational efficiency [77][78][79][80][81][82].…”
Section: Methodology Of Coupled Dem-femmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a low rolling resistance coefficient of 0.1 is adopted to simulate rounded particles with slight elongation according to a series of biaxial tests with DEM conducted by the authors [71]. The model parameters are summarized in Table 1, which were validated in previous DEM studies by the authors [2,34,72].…”
Section:    mentioning
confidence: 99%