Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-Genetic algorithm with fuzzy selection of operators for multi-Objective optimization: μFAME

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed DRL model regards the decision vectors as states and the operators as actions; then, the fitness improvement of the solution brought by the operator is taken as the reward. Alejandro et al [28] suggested a fuzzy selection of operators that chooses the most appropriate operators during evolution to promote both diversity and convergence of solutions. Dong et al [18] devised a test-and-apply structure to adaptively select the operator for decomposition-based MOEAs.…”
Section: B Adaptive Operator Selection In Mopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed DRL model regards the decision vectors as states and the operators as actions; then, the fitness improvement of the solution brought by the operator is taken as the reward. Alejandro et al [28] suggested a fuzzy selection of operators that chooses the most appropriate operators during evolution to promote both diversity and convergence of solutions. Dong et al [18] devised a test-and-apply structure to adaptively select the operator for decomposition-based MOEAs.…”
Section: B Adaptive Operator Selection In Mopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the non-dominated Pareto solutions obtained by the proposed algorithm is measured and compared with those of the MOGWO, MOSMA, NSGA-II, MOEA-D and MOPSO algorithms by using several performance metrics, namely the spacing metric (SM), the Cindex metric [48], Hypervolume (HV) [49][50][51] and the computational burden for the solutions. For a fair comparison, we set the parameters of MOPSO, MOEA-D, MOGWO, MOSMA, and NSGA-II to the values given in Table 7, where n in MOEA-D algorithm is the number of population.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Solution Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22] used the multi-objective strawberry algorithm and fuzzy algorithm to study the multi-objective system availability and cost optimization of the parallelseries system, a numerical case study involving 10 subsystems highlights the applicability of the proposed approach. In [23] and [24] used fuzzy systems to overcome the diversity loss caused by elitism and selected appropriate operators in the evolution process to increase the diversity and convergence of the solution. Liu et al [25] proposed a fuzzy decomposition-based MOEA, which uses a fuzzy system to estimate the shape of the population and extracts minimum similar solutions as weight vectors to obtain constrained fuzzy sub-problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%