2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10544-016-0064-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro fluorescence in situ hybridization (μFISH) for spatially multiplexed analysis of a cell monolayer

Abstract: We here present a micrometer-scale implementation of fluorescence in situ hybridization that we term μFISH. This μFISH implementation makes use of a non-contact scanning probe technology, namely, a microfluidic probe (MFP) that hydrodynamically shapes nanoliter volumes of liquid on a surface with micrometer resolution. By confining FISH probes at the tip of this microfabricated scanning probe, we locally exposed approximately 1000 selected MCF-7 cells of a monolayer to perform incubation of probes — the rate-l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We aimed to enumerate the copy numbers of chromosome 17 in FFPE tissue sections, and for this, we adapted the MFP-based FISH method 29 . In contrast to the “fresh” cells we used for our previous study, FFPE samples undergo a series of preparation steps affecting the sample integrity 32–38 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We aimed to enumerate the copy numbers of chromosome 17 in FFPE tissue sections, and for this, we adapted the MFP-based FISH method 29 . In contrast to the “fresh” cells we used for our previous study, FFPE samples undergo a series of preparation steps affecting the sample integrity 32–38 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the traditional microfluidic devices, the MFP is a scanning, non-contact technology, which allows reagents to be shaped in the “open space.” This allows microfluidic-based FISH to be performed on cells in selected regions of the tissue section without physical contact between the device and the cytological sample. In previous work, 29 we introduced the concept of microfluidic-based FISH (μFISH) with an MFP where we demonstrated spatially multiplex micro-scale FISH on cells. To demonstrate the diagnostic use of μFISH with an MFP, here we present methods and protocols for rapid HER2 status assessment of FFPE cell blocks and tissue sections while also using small volumes of FISH probes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The device can essentially scan over a cell layer or tissue slice, measuring in zones of interest in a fast manner. The probe was first applied to FISH on breast cancer cell lines with about 1000 cells interrogated at a time [75]. Signals were obtained with hybridization times as short as 3 min with 0.6 µL of probe, followed by a 2-min wash, faster than any other method reported for FISH.…”
Section: Vertical Microfluidic Probe For Cell Layers and Tissue Slicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproduced with permission from Ref. [77] investigation varied, some using only 50-100 cells [41,52,58] or on the order of 1000 cells [57,75], others at tens of thousands [56,59].…”
Section: Comparison Of Microfluidic Fish Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Recently, for implementing rapid, economical, and multiplexed FISH for cell analysis, Huber et al proposed scanning a vertically oriented capillary that creates a hydrodynamic flow of FISH probe on a small area (~0.096 mm 2 ) of the cell slide surface. 9 However, this technique can work only with fast hybridization centromere probes and has a small footprint due to the limited size of the capillary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%